DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. White, 423 P.2d 716.

31 citing documents.

  • Joel Carson v. Hon. gentry/state Ariz. 2025
  • Lay v. Hon. nelson/state 436 P.3d 496 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Lay v. Hon. nelson/state 436 P.3d 496 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    (Plea in superior court waived any error in preliminary matters: "Jurisdiction to try all felonies is conferred on the Superior Court .
  • State v. Laguna 602 P.2d 847 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
  • State v. Laguna 602 P.2d 847 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
    (a guilty plea constitutes a waiver of all nonjurisdictional defenses); , (a defendant waives defects in the filing of a complaint and holding of a preliminary hearing when he pleads guilty instead of moving to quash the information).
  • State v. Diaz 588 P.2d 309 Ariz. 1978
  • State v. Diaz 588 P.2d 309 Ariz. 1978
  • State v. Pena 541 P.2d 406 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
  • State v. Pena 541 P.2d 406 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
    (a defendant who pled guilty to a charge not included in the information, deemed to have waived a preliminary hearing for that charge); , (defendant’s plea of guilty waived any claim he was prevented from assisting his counsel at preliminary hear
  • Griswold v. Gomes 523 P.2d 490 Ariz. 1974
  • Griswold v. Gomes 523 P.2d 490 Ariz. 1974
  • State v. Keeney 492 P.2d 715 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
  • State v. Keeney 492 P.2d 715 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
  • State v. Fenton 472 P.2d 492 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
  • State v. Fenton 472 P.2d 492 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
  • State v. Hansen 464 P.2d 960 Ariz. 1970
  • State v. Hansen 464 P.2d 960 Ariz. 1970
    we held that when an accused pleads guilty to an information, he waives any defects in the preliminary examination.
  • State v. Jennings 448 P.2d 59 Ariz. 1969
  • State v. Jennings 448 P.2d 59 Ariz. 1969
  • Eyman v. Superior Court in and for County of Pinal 448 P.2d 878 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
  • Eyman v. Superior Court in and for County of Pinal 448 P.2d 878 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
    17 A.R.S., Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 79.
  • State v. Olbekson 441 P.2d 71 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
  • State v. Olbekson 441 P.2d 71 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
  • Womack v. State 440 P.2d 336 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
  • Womack v. State 440 P.2d 336 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
    Rules 79, 169 and 177, Rules of Criminal Procedure, 17 A.R.S.
  • Landers v. State Ex Rel. Eyman 437 P.2d 681 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
  • Landers v. State Ex Rel. Eyman 437 P.2d 681 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
    Furthermore, any defects in the conduct of the preliminary examination, if petitioner’s complaint be construed to be that of lack of a preliminary examination, were waived when no timely objection to the information was made before petitioner plead, Rule 79, Rules of Criminal Procedure, 17 A.R.S.; , and is not reviewable by habeas corpus.
  • State v. Kelley 434 P.2d 663 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
  • State v. Kelley 434 P.2d 663 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
    rt has made it clear that the defendant may not only waive preliminary hearing in the Justice Court, but when the defendant pleads guilty in the Superior Court he waives the right to subsequently question the lack of a preliminary hearing in the Justice Court: “We have held that when the accused pleads guilty to an information he waives any defects in the preliminary examination.”
  • Application of Buccheri 431 P.2d 91 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
  • Application of Buccheri 431 P.2d 91 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967