Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Coburn v. City of Tucson, 691 P.2d 1078.

132 citing documents.

Udy v. Calvary Corp. 780 P.2d 1055 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
McLEOD BY AND THROUGH SMITH v. Newcomer 785 P.2d 575 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
McLEOD BY AND THROUGH SMITH v. Newcomer 785 P.2d 575 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Dunham v. Pima County 778 P.2d 1200 Ariz. 1989
Dunham v. Pima County 778 P.2d 1200 Ariz. 1989
Dolezal v. Carbrey 778 P.2d 1261 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Dolezal v. Carbrey 778 P.2d 1261 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Delozier v. Evans 763 P.2d 986 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Delozier v. Evans 763 P.2d 986 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
: We believe that an attempt to equate the concept of “duty” with such specific details on conduct is unwise.
Dunham v. Pima County 754 P.2d 761 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Dunham v. Pima County 754 P.2d 761 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
“What is ‘reasonably safe’ takes into consideration certain minimal expectations that travelers follow the usual rules of the road.”
Franko v. Mitchell 762 P.2d 1345 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Law v. Superior Court of State of Ariz. 755 P.2d 1135 Ariz. 1988
Law v. Superior Court of State of Ariz. 755 P.2d 1135 Ariz. 1988
As indicated in Markowitz , we do not believe the concept of duty should be confused “with specific details of conduct.” 146 Ariz. at 355 , 706 P.2d at 367
Duncan v. State 754 P.2d 1160 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Duncan v. State 754 P.2d 1160 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
citing W. Prosser and W. Keaton, The Law of Torts § 53 at 356 (5th ed. 1984).
Dorman v. Swift & Co. 757 P.2d 1064 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Dorman v. Swift & Co. 757 P.2d 1064 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Even if an individual is guilty of a negligent act, “liability does not attach unless there is also a duty.”
Cooke v. Berlin 735 P.2d 830 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Cooke v. Berlin 735 P.2d 830 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Contempo Const. v. MT. STATES T. & T. CO. 736 P.2d 13 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Contempo Const. v. MT. STATES T. & T. CO. 736 P.2d 13 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Johnson v. Maricopa County 730 P.2d 862 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Johnson v. Maricopa County 730 P.2d 862 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Bach v. State 730 P.2d 854 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Bach v. State 730 P.2d 854 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
disposes of the issues on appeal.
Rossell v. Volkswagen of America 709 P.2d 517 Ariz. 1985
Rossell v. Volkswagen of America 709 P.2d 517 Ariz. 1985
quoting W. Prosser & W. Keeton, THE LAW OF TORTS § 53 at 356 (5th ed. 1984).
Markowitz v. Arizona Parks Board 706 P.2d 364 Ariz. 1985
Markowitz v. Arizona Parks Board 706 P.2d 364 Ariz. 1985
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints v. Superior Court 714 P.2d 431 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints v. Superior Court 714 P.2d 431 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985