Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite City of Phoenix v. Geyler, 697 P.2d 1073.
- Ochoa v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
-
Ochoa v. State
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
We review a court’s decision to bifurcate a trial under Rule 42(b) for an abuse of discretion, and we will affirm the court’s decision if correct for any reason
- Motley v. Simmons 537 P.3d 807 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
-
Motley v. Simmons
537 P.3d 807
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
(recognizing that appellate courts have an obligation to affirm if a reasonable interpretation of the facts and law support the trial court’s judgment “even if the trial court [] reached the right result for the wrong reason”); ¶ 9 (App. 2006).
- Custom Accounting v. Sal E. Mander Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
-
Custom Accounting v. Sal E. Mander
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
(“[T]he standard we apply to the review of a trial court’s order granting or denying relief under Rule 60(c) is whether the court abused its discretion.”).
- Moore v. Dasilva Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
- In Re the Estate of Susan Ruth Chalker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2023
-
Moore v. Dasilva
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
We review the superior court’s grant of Rule 85 relief for an abuse of discretion and will affirm “unless undisputed facts and circumstances require a contrary ruling.” (cleaned up).
-
In Re the Estate of Susan Ruth Chalker
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2023
We will also sustain a court’s denial of a Rule 60 motion for relief from judgment “unless ‘undisputed facts and circumstances require a contrary ruling.’” (quoting Coconino Pulp & ).
- Hall v. Hardy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
- Hall v. Hardy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
- Mays v. Mwm Vicsdale Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
-
Mays v. Mwm Vicsdale
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
DISCUSSION ¶6 We review the denial of Rule 60 relief for an abuse of discretion and will affirm “unless undisputed facts and circumstances require a contrary ruling.” (cleaned up).
- David C. Shinn v. Az boec/freeman Ariz. 2022
- David C. Shinn v. Az boec/freeman Ariz. 2022
- Rca Avionics v. Juniper Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
- Rca Avionics v. Juniper Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
- Zambezi v. Proforma Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
- Zambezi v. Proforma Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
- Link v. Valdez-Acosta Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
- Link v. Valdez-Acosta Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
- Kogan v. tibsherany/murray Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
- Kogan v. tibsherany/murray Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
- Williams v. McLaughlin, Jr. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
-
Williams v. McLaughlin, Jr.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
We review the court’s denial of a Rule 60(b) motion for an abuse of discretion, ¶ 8 (2018), and will affirm “unless undisputed facts and circumstances require a contrary ruling,” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).
- Bmo v. Espiau Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Bmo v. Espiau Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- McFarlane v. McFarlane Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
-
McFarlane v. McFarlane
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
We review a court’s order granting or denying post-decree relief for an abuse of discretion, which occurs if the court commits an error of law in exercising its discretion, ¶ 23 (App. 2004).
- D.T. v. C.L Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
-
D.T. v. C.L
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
3 We reject as unfounded Father’s contention that Mother waived or abandoned her challenge to the Rule 85 order by virtue of deficiencies in her opening brief.
- Imh v. Maniatis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
-
Imh v. Maniatis
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
We will affirm “unless undisputed facts and circumstances require a contrary ruling.” (internal quotation marks omitted).
- Murrell v. Tovar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Murrell v. Tovar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- In Re $200.00 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
-
In Re $200.00
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
v. Microsoft Corp., ¶ 17 (App. 2006)
- Sarah B. v. Dcs, K.J. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Sarah B. v. Dcs, K.J. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Stephanie S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Stephanie S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Imh v. Beck Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Imh v. Beck
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Power Prods., Inc. v. CSK Auto, Inc., ¶ 10 (2016) (Rule 59); (Rule 60).
- Murillo v. Tuckett Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Murillo v. Tuckett Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- commonwealth/fidelity v. Centerpoint Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
commonwealth/fidelity v. Centerpoint
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
see also Old Pueblo Plastic Surgery, P.C.
- Munoz v. Zepeda Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Munoz v. Zepeda
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
(finding 3 MUNOZ v. ZEPEDA Decision of the Court excusable neglect where “the mistake .