Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Burch & Cracchiolo, P.A. v. Pugliani, 697 P.2d 674.

35 citing documents.

Mac Kenzie v. Howerton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Mac Kenzie v. Howerton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
v. Pugliani, (citing Amtitle Tr.
Garsha v. Hill Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Garsha v. Hill Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Acedo v. Mannion Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Acedo v. Mannion Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Haworth v. Ligon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Haworth v. Ligon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
v. Pugliani, (“A prerequisite to the imposition of a constructive trust is the identification of a specific property belonging to the claimant.”); (“A prerequisite to the imposition of a constructive trust is the identification of a specific property, or res, in
Whiles v. Henderson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Whiles v. Henderson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Roberto F. v. Department of Child Safety 332 P.3d 614 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Cal X-Tra v. W.V.S v. Holdings, L.L.C. 276 P.3d 11 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Cal X-Tra v. W.V.S v. Holdings, L.L.C. 276 P.3d 11 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Murphy Farrell Development, LLLP v. Sourant 272 P.3d 355 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Murphy Farrell Development, LLLP v. Sourant 272 P.3d 355 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
v. Pugliani, -86 , -79 (1985), it may be imposed when the plaintiff has not suffered a loss of ownership, such as when the defendant wrongly prevented the plaintiff from acquiring the property or reaped a profit through violation of a fiduciary duty owed to the plaintiff.
Smith v. Mitchell 148 P.3d 1151 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Smith v. Mitchell 148 P.3d 1151 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Schwab v. Ames Const. 83 P.3d 56 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Schwab v. Ames Const. 83 P.3d 56 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Co., , overruled on other grounds by Burch &amp
In re the Estate of Fishman 30 P.3d 140 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
In re the Estate of Fishman 30 P.3d 140 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
v. Pugliani, , (constructive trust imposed where person wrongfully holding property would be unjustly enriched); 5 Austin W. Scott & William F. Fratcher, The Law of Trusts § 462 (4th ed.1989) (constructive trust arises where one would be unjustly enriched if permitted to retain property); Restatement of Res
Hall v. World Savings & Loan Ass'n 943 P.2d 855 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Hall v. World Savings & Loan Ass'n 943 P.2d 855 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
484 , 21 L.Ed.2d 463 (1968), overruled on other grounds by Burch &amp
Westin Tucson Hotel Co. v. State Department of Revenue 936 P.2d 183 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Westin Tucson Hotel Co. v. State Department of Revenue 936 P.2d 183 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Hunnicutt Construction, Inc. v. Stewart Title & Trust of Tucson Trust No. 3496 928 P.2d 725 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
Hunnicutt Construction, Inc. v. Stewart Title & Trust of Tucson Trust No. 3496 928 P.2d 725 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
v. Pugliani, , and arises "when the duty to make restitution arises — when the wrong occurs.” Id.
Premier Financial Services. v. Citibank 912 P.2d 1309 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Premier Financial Services. v. Citibank 912 P.2d 1309 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
v. Pugliani, , the Arizona Supreme Court held that the mere filing of a complaint alleging a conflicting claim to prevent the disbursal of a trust is “too much remedy for too little wrong.” 144 Ariz. at 288, 697 P.2d at 681.
State Compensation Fund v. Ireland 851 P.2d 115 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
State Compensation Fund v. Ireland 851 P.2d 115 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
v. Pugliani, , (constructive trust created when one person enriches himself by wrongly holding another’s property); , (implied contract is inferred as matter of reason and justice from acts and conduct of parties and their circumstances).
Pioneer Annuity Life Insurance v. National Equity Life Insurance 765 P.2d 550 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Pioneer Annuity Life Insurance v. National Equity Life Insurance 765 P.2d 550 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Wilcox v. Waldman 744 P.2d 444 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Wilcox v. Waldman 744 P.2d 444 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
v. Pugliani, , in which attorneys who had made claims pursuant to a fee agreement to property held in trust for their clients sought to hold the trustee liable for disbursing the trust property to the clients who were beneficiaries under the trust agreement.