Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial Hospital, 710 P.2d 1025.

385 citing documents.

Piccola by and Through Piccola v. Woodall 921 P.2d 710 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Ogden v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 933 P.2d 1200 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Ogden v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 933 P.2d 1200 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
§ 12-341.01(A) (“In any contested action arising out of a contract, express or implied, the court may award the successful party reasonable attorney’s fees.”); , (“A.R.S.
Taylor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 913 P.2d 1092 Ariz. 1996
Taylor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 913 P.2d 1092 Ariz. 1996
Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial Hospital
Burnette v. Bender 908 P.2d 1086 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Burnette v. Bender 908 P.2d 1086 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
(requiring party seeking attorney’s fees on “prevailing party” theory to put other party on notice before “each stage of the law suit”); , (refusing to allow party to make a post-tri
Wallace v. CASA GRANDE SC. BD. OF GOV. 909 P.2d 486 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
Wallace v. CASA GRANDE SC. BD. OF GOV. 909 P.2d 486 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
and Bernstein v. Aetna Life & Casualty, 843 F.2d 359 (9th Cir.1988), she contends that fact issues existed as to whether Adams wilfully, intentionally and improperly interfered with that business expectancy and her employment relationship, thus precluding summary judgment on this claim.
Duncan v. St. Joseph's Hospital & Medical Center 903 P.2d 1107 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Duncan v. St. Joseph's Hospital & Medical Center 903 P.2d 1107 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Hosp., -76 , -31 (1985).
Mintz v. Bell Atlantic Systems Leasing International, Inc. 905 P.2d 559 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Mintz v. Bell Atlantic Systems Leasing International, Inc. 905 P.2d 559 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
in which the Arizona Supreme Court recognized a tort for wrongful discharge from *553 employment when the reason for the discharge violates public policy.
Gust, Rosenfeld & Henderson v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America 898 P.2d 964 Ariz. 1995
Gust, Rosenfeld & Henderson v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America 898 P.2d 964 Ariz. 1995
But if we truly imply into every contract a covenant of good faith and fair dealing, , why should the parties have to secure from one another more than a solemn promise to perform?
Hill v. Chubb Life American Insurance 894 P.2d 701 Ariz. 1995
Hill v. Chubb Life American Insurance 894 P.2d 701 Ariz. 1995
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Lindsey 885 P.2d 144 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Lindsey 885 P.2d 144 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Wagenseller v. Scotts *464 dale Memorial Hosp.
Owens v. City of Phoenix 884 P.2d 1100 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Owens v. City of Phoenix 884 P.2d 1100 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
MacK v. McDonnell Douglas Helicopter Co. 880 P.2d 1173 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
MacK v. McDonnell Douglas Helicopter Co. 880 P.2d 1173 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Nelson v. Phoenix Resort Corp. 888 P.2d 1375 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Nelson v. Phoenix Resort Corp. 888 P.2d 1375 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Carroll v. Robinson 874 P.2d 1010 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Carroll v. Robinson 874 P.2d 1010 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Sanborn v. Brooker & Wake Property Management, Inc. 874 P.2d 982 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Sanborn v. Brooker & Wake Property Management, Inc. 874 P.2d 982 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Appellants, however, contend that the standard for determining who is a , , and ask us to overturn the award on the basis of that standard.
Smith v. American Express Travel Related Services Co. 876 P.2d 1166 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Smith v. American Express Travel Related Services Co. 876 P.2d 1166 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Wagenseller v. Scottsdale *134 Memorial Hosp.
Fobes v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Arizona, Inc. 861 P.2d 692 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Fobes v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Arizona, Inc. 861 P.2d 692 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Burris v. City of Phoenix 875 P.2d 1340 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Burris v. City of Phoenix 875 P.2d 1340 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
The court stated, ‘We base this on the absence of express language in the Act indicating preemption as well as the decisions in Wagenseller [v. Scottsdale Memorial Hosp., , ]; Ford [v. Revlon, Inc., , ]; and Bernstein [v. Aetna Life and Casualty, 843 F.2d 359 (9th Cir.1988)].
Ponderosa Plaza v. Siplast 888 P.2d 1315 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Ponderosa Plaza v. Siplast 888 P.2d 1315 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Ponderosa next argues that, assuming this action arises out of contract, the award of attorney’s
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Foust 869 P.2d 183 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Foust 869 P.2d 183 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Villas at Hidden Lakes Condominiums Ass'n v. Geupel Construction Co. 847 P.2d 117 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Ruiz v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona 847 P.2d 111 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Ruiz v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona 847 P.2d 111 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
We find that an award of attorneys’ , , *72 1049 (1985) (supp. op.).
Villas at Hidden Lakes Condominiums Ass'n v. Geupel Construction Co. 847 P.2d 117 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Weller v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 860 P.2d 487 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Weller v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 860 P.2d 487 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Newman v. Sun Valley Crushing Co. 844 P.2d 623 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Newman v. Sun Valley Crushing Co. 844 P.2d 623 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Miller v. Servicemaster by Rees 851 P.2d 143 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Miller v. Servicemaster by Rees 851 P.2d 143 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Broemmer v. Abortion Services of Phoenix, Ltd. 840 P.2d 1013 Ariz. 1992