Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Boag, 453 P.2d 508.
-
State of Arizona v. Edward Littleton McCauley
Ariz. 2026
(“When there are no facts indicating that a juror looked at the [extrinsic evidence], the appellate court will not reverse merely on the grounds that they were available.”); Hall, 204 Ariz. at 448 ¶ 19 (considering whether the material was actually received by the jury, and if so, the length of time it was
- State v. Stephens Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
State v. Stephens
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
(“[A] person of sound mind is presumed to have intended the natural and probable consequence of every act deliberately done.”).
- State v. Lewis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- State v. Lewis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- State v. Crawford Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
State v. Crawford
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶8 Prosecutors “are given wide latitude in their closing arguments to the jury.” ().
- State v. Davolt 84 P.3d 456 Ariz. 2004
-
State v. Davolt
84 P.3d 456
Ariz. 2004
See State v. Boag, 104 Ariz. 362, 366, (“[A]bsent incontrovertible evidence of hurt, the trial court should be permitted to use such means to secure the named ends.”) (citations omitted).
- State v. Lee 944 P.2d 1222 Ariz. 1997
-
State v. Lee
944 P.2d 1222
Ariz. 1997
310 , 136 L.Ed.2d 226 (1996) ( , ).
- State v. McKinney 917 P.2d 1214 Ariz. 1996
-
State v. McKinney
917 P.2d 1214
Ariz. 1996
In State v. Boag, this court commented on the obvious need to leave matters of courtroom security to the discretion of the judge, stating that “absent incontrovertible evidence of [harm to the defendant], the trial court should be permitted to use such means, to secure the named ends [as circumstances require].”
- State v. Comer 799 P.2d 333 Ariz. 1990
- State v. Comer 799 P.2d 333 Ariz. 1990
- State v. Fayle 658 P.2d 218 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
- State v. Fayle 658 P.2d 218 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
- State v. Turrentine 592 P.2d 1305 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
-
State v. Turrentine
592 P.2d 1305
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
236 P. 1112 (1925); , 24B C.J.S.
- State v. Means 566 P.2d 303 Ariz. 1977
- State v. Means 566 P.2d 303 Ariz. 1977
- State v. Arnold 565 P.2d 1282 Ariz. 1977
- State v. Arnold 565 P.2d 1282 Ariz. 1977
- State v. Dover 559 P.2d 697 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
- State v. Dover 559 P.2d 697 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
- State v. Wilcynski 534 P.2d 738 Ariz. 1975
- State v. Wilcynski 534 P.2d 738 Ariz. 1975
- State v. Barnett 531 P.2d 148 Ariz. 1975
- State v. Barnett 531 P.2d 148 Ariz. 1975
- State v. McDonald 526 P.2d 698 Ariz. 1974
- State v. McDonald 526 P.2d 698 Ariz. 1974
- Boag v. State 520 P.2d 317 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
- Boag v. State 520 P.2d 317 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
- State v. Jorgenson 502 P.2d 158 Ariz. 1972
-
State v. Jorgenson
502 P.2d 158
Ariz. 1972
See, for example, , where the defendant robbed his victims and then committed mayhem and assaulted them with intent to commit murder.
- State v. Nielsen 495 P.2d 847 Ariz. 1972
- State v. Nielsen 495 P.2d 847 Ariz. 1972
- State v. Hopkins 495 P.2d 440 Ariz. 1972
- State v. Hopkins 495 P.2d 440 Ariz. 1972
- State v. Black 494 P.2d 1332 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
-
State v. Black
494 P.2d 1332
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
State v. Loggins, 13 Ariz.App.
- State v. White 494 P.2d 714 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
- State v. White 494 P.2d 714 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
- State v. Tinghitella 491 P.2d 834 Ariz. 1971
- State v. Tinghitella 491 P.2d 834 Ariz. 1971
- State v. Seelen 485 P.2d 826 Ariz. 1971
- State v. Seelen 485 P.2d 826 Ariz. 1971
- State v. Schindorff 484 P.2d 4 Ariz. 1971
- State v. Schindorff 484 P.2d 4 Ariz. 1971
- State v. Tillery 481 P.2d 271 Ariz. 1971