Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Kriz v. Buckeye Petroleum Co., Inc., 701 P.2d 1182.

76 citing documents.

Guertin v. Dixon 864 P.2d 1072 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
“The cardinal rule of statutory construction is to ascertain the meaning of a statute and the intent of the legislature at the time the legislature acted.”
Bigelsen v. Arizona State Board of Medical Examiners 853 P.2d 1133 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Bigelsen v. Arizona State Board of Medical Examiners 853 P.2d 1133 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Kriz v. Buckeye Petroleum Co., Inc.
State v. Womack 847 P.2d 609 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
State v. Richardson 833 P.2d 714 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
State v. Richardson 833 P.2d 714 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Vo v. Superior Court 836 P.2d 408 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Vo v. Superior Court 836 P.2d 408 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Dietz v. General Electric Co. 821 P.2d 166 Ariz. 1991
Dietz v. General Electric Co. 821 P.2d 166 Ariz. 1991
Kriz v. Buckeye Petroleum Co., Inc., , Calvert v. Farmers Ins.
Tracy v. Superior Court 810 P.2d 1030 Ariz. 1991
Tracy v. Superior Court 810 P.2d 1030 Ariz. 1991
State v. Iniguez 821 P.2d 194 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
State v. Iniguez 821 P.2d 194 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Kriz v. Buckeye Petroleum Co., Inc.
Wyatt v. Wehmueller 806 P.2d 870 Ariz. 1991
Wyatt v. Wehmueller 806 P.2d 870 Ariz. 1991
Nikolous v. Superior Court 756 P.2d 925 Ariz. 1988
Nikolous v. Superior Court 756 P.2d 925 Ariz. 1988
The City answered and moved for summary judgment on the grounds that the applicable statutes of limitations barred the complaint
State v. Ramos 747 P.2d 629 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
State v. Ramos 747 P.2d 629 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Kriz v. Buckeye Petroleum Co., Inc., , Calvert v. Farmers Ins.
Stuart v. Insurance Co. of North America 730 P.2d 255 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Stuart v. Insurance Co. of North America 730 P.2d 255 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
State Ex Rel. Corbin v. United Energy Corp. 725 P.2d 752 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
State Ex Rel. Corbin v. United Energy Corp. 725 P.2d 752 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Hall v. A.N.R. Freight System, Inc. 717 P.2d 434 Ariz. 1986
Hall v. A.N.R. Freight System, Inc. 717 P.2d 434 Ariz. 1986
In Kriz v. Buckeye Petroleum Company, Inc., , which was a certified question of law, we were called upon to interpret several provisions of the Act’s contribution provisions.