Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Markowitz v. Arizona Parks Board, 706 P.2d 364.

306 citing documents.

Rosen v. Knaub 857 P.2d 381 Ariz. 1993
Rosen v. Knaub 857 P.2d 381 Ariz. 1993
the Rosens argue that the “sudden appearance” and "unusual event” instructions were incorrect statements of law, and that the trial court therefore erred in giving them.
Morton v. Maricopa County 865 P.2d 808 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
Morton v. Maricopa County 865 P.2d 808 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
Newman v. Sun Valley Crushing Co. 844 P.2d 623 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Newman v. Sun Valley Crushing Co. 844 P.2d 623 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
*459 On appeal, the Newmans first contend that the trial court granted summary judgment based on a finding of a lack of duty owed to the Newmans by the defendants and that this conclusion is erroneous as a
Ocotillo West Joint Venture v. Superior Court 844 P.2d 653 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Ocotillo West Joint Venture v. Superior Court 844 P.2d 653 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
A duty must be recognized by law and must obligate a defendant “to conform to a particular standard of conduct in order to protect others against unreasonable risks of harm.”
Bellezzo v. State 851 P.2d 847 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Bellezzo v. State 851 P.2d 847 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Hydroculture, Inc. v. Coopers & Lybrand 848 P.2d 856 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Hydroculture, Inc. v. Coopers & Lybrand 848 P.2d 856 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Bishop v. State, Dept. of Corrections 837 P.2d 1207 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Bishop v. State, Dept. of Corrections 837 P.2d 1207 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Shanks v. Davey Tree Surgery Co. 845 P.2d 483 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
Shanks v. Davey Tree Surgery Co. 845 P.2d 483 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
Rosen v. Knaub 842 P.2d 1317 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Overruled Rosen v. Knaub 842 P.2d 1317 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Woodty v. Weston's Lamplighter Motels 830 P.2d 477 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Woodty v. Weston's Lamplighter Motels 830 P.2d 477 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Robertson v. Sixpence Inns of America, Inc.
Petolicchio v. Santa Cruz County Fair & Rodeo Ass'n 838 P.2d 1348 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
Petolicchio v. Santa Cruz County Fair & Rodeo Ass'n 838 P.2d 1348 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
Lewis v. N.J. Riebe Enterprises, Inc. 825 P.2d 5 Ariz. 1992
Lewis v. N.J. Riebe Enterprises, Inc. 825 P.2d 5 Ariz. 1992
(issue of duty one of law for the court).
Ferguson v. Cash, Sullivan & Cross Insurance Agency, Inc. 831 P.2d 380 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Ferguson v. Cash, Sullivan & Cross Insurance Agency, Inc. 831 P.2d 380 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
v. Superior Court, , ( , ).
Shaw v. Petersen 821 P.2d 220 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Shaw v. Petersen 821 P.2d 220 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Parks Board, 146 Ariz 352, 354
Easter v. Percy 810 P.2d 1053 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Easter v. Percy 810 P.2d 1053 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Estate of Aten v. City of Tucson 817 P.2d 951 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
Estate of Aten v. City of Tucson 817 P.2d 951 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
Newman v. Maricopa County 808 P.2d 1253 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Newman v. Maricopa County 808 P.2d 1253 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Carrow Co. v. Lusby 804 P.2d 747 Ariz. 1990
Lewis v. N.J. Riebe Enterprises, Inc. 823 P.2d 74 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Lewis v. N.J. Riebe Enterprises, Inc. 823 P.2d 74 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Carrow Co. v. Lusby 804 P.2d 747 Ariz. 1990
Orme School v. Reeves 802 P.2d 1000 Ariz. 1990
Orme School v. Reeves 802 P.2d 1000 Ariz. 1990
1957 , 90 L.Ed.2d 365 (1986); -58 , -70 (1985) (whether danger of injury was foreseeable is question of fact for jury); , (whether negligence is proximate cause of injury or damage is generally a question for the jury).
Tamsen v. Weber 802 P.2d 1063 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Tamsen v. Weber 802 P.2d 1063 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Alhambra School District v. Superior Court 796 P.2d 470 Ariz. 1990
Alhambra School District v. Superior Court 796 P.2d 470 Ariz. 1990
WALKER BY PIZANO v. Mart 790 P.2d 735 Ariz. 1990
WALKER BY PIZANO v. Mart 790 P.2d 735 Ariz. 1990
See Markowitz v. Arizona Parks *41 Bd.
Robertson v. Sixpence Inns of America, Inc. 789 P.2d 1040 Ariz. 1990
Robertson v. Sixpence Inns of America, Inc. 789 P.2d 1040 Ariz. 1990
The court of appeals, , correctly noted that plaintiff must show defendant owed “a duty or obligation, recognized by law, which requires the defendant to conform to a particular standard of conduct in order to protect others against unreasonable risks of harm” to withstand a motion for directed verdict in a n
Carrillo v. El Mirage Roadhouse, Inc. 793 P.2d 121 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Carrillo v. El Mirage Roadhouse, Inc. 793 P.2d 121 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990