Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Linsner, 467 P.2d 238.
- State v. Petkovic Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
-
State v. Petkovic
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
(“A defendant must enter a guilty plea freely and voluntarily with understanding of the nature and consequences of the plea.”); Cf. Moran v. Burbine, 475 U.S. 412, 421 (1986) (“[W]aiver must have been made with a full awareness of both the nature of the right being abandoned and the consequences of the dec
- State v. Mitcham 535 P.3d 948 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
-
State v. Mitcham
535 P.3d 948
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
In any event, a “plea is itself a conviction and like a jury verdict is conclusive.”
- State v. Blunt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
-
State v. Blunt
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
This court’s “power to revise and reduce sentences imposed by the trial court should be used with great caution and exercised only when it clearly appears that a sentence is too severe.”
- State v. Christensen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
-
State v. Christensen
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
(“[T]he power to revise and reduce sentences imposed by the trial court should be used with great caution and exercised only when it clearly appears that a sentence is too severe.”).
- State v. Estrada Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
-
State v. Estrada
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
(“[T]he power to revise and reduce sentences imposed by the trial court should be used with 4 STATE v. ESTRADA Decision of the Court great caution and exercised only when it clearly appears that a sentence is t
- State v. Harm 340 P.3d 1110 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
State v. Harm
340 P.3d 1110
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
(“[A] jury verdict is conclusive.”) (citing Machibroda v. United States, 368 U.S. 487, 493 (1962)).
- In Re Lockwood 804 P.2d 738 Ariz. 1990
-
In Re Lockwood
804 P.2d 738
Ariz. 1990
1709 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969)
- State v. Watton 793 P.2d 80 Ariz. 1990
- State v. Watton 793 P.2d 80 Ariz. 1990
- State v. Bernecker 791 P.2d 1083 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
- State v. Bernecker 791 P.2d 1083 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
- State v. Lukens 729 P.2d 306 Ariz. 1986
-
State v. Lukens
729 P.2d 306
Ariz. 1986
1709 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969)
- State v. Gannon 638 P.2d 206 Ariz. 1981
- State v. Gannon 638 P.2d 206 Ariz. 1981
- State v. Cutler 590 P.2d 444 Ariz. 1979
- State v. Cutler 590 P.2d 444 Ariz. 1979
- State v. Ferguson 547 P.2d 1085 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
- State v. Ferguson 547 P.2d 1085 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
- State v. Carr 527 P.2d 1250 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1974
-
State v. Carr
527 P.2d 1250
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1974
1709 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969)
- State v. Fischer 498 P.2d 147 Ariz. 1972
- State v. Fischer 498 P.2d 147 Ariz. 1972
- State v. Ritchey 490 P.2d 558 Ariz. 1971
- State v. Ritchey 490 P.2d 558 Ariz. 1971
- State v. Lerch 490 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1971
-
State v. Lerch
490 P.2d 1
Ariz. 1971
It is well-established that a defendant must enter a plea freely and voluntarily with an understanding of- the nature and consequences of his plea, , and such plea must not be induced by promises or threats for this would deprive it of the character of a voluntary act.
- State v. Garcia 483 P.2d 55 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
-
State v. Garcia
483 P.2d 55
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 , 91 S.Ct.
- State v. Leuck 481 P.2d 842 Ariz. 1971
-
State v. Leuck
481 P.2d 842
Ariz. 1971
Kercheval v. United States, 274 U.S. 220 , 47 S.Ct.
- State v. Leuck 475 P.2d 745 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
-
State v. Leuck
475 P.2d 745
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Cortez v. United States, 337 F.2d 699 (9th Cir. 1964)
- State v. Bridges 468 P.2d 604 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
-
State v. Bridges
468 P.2d 604
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
decided 2 April 1970, citing Griswold.