Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Anderson v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA, 711 P.2d 595.

25 citing documents.

Wagner v. State 393 P.3d 156 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Wagner v. State 393 P.3d 156 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Lee v. M & H Enterprises, Inc. 347 P.3d 1153 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Lee v. M & H Enterprises, Inc. 347 P.3d 1153 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Callan, Miranda, Azuelo... v. Pimber Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Callan, Miranda, Azuelo... v. Pimber Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Gamez v. Brush Wellman, Inc. 34 P.3d 375 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
Gamez v. Brush Wellman, Inc. 34 P.3d 375 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
who accepts [workers’] compensation waives the right to exercise any option to institute proceedings in court against his employer.” See Anderson v. Industrial Comm’n
Stoecker v. Brush Wellman, Inc. 984 P.2d 534 Ariz. 1999
Stoecker v. Brush Wellman, Inc. 984 P.2d 534 Ariz. 1999
Id.; see also Anderson v. Industrial Comm’n
Diaz v. Magma Copper Co. 950 P.2d 1165 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
Diaz v. Magma Copper Co. 950 P.2d 1165 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
Delbridge v. SALT RIVER PROJECT AGR. IMP. 893 P.2d 46 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Delbridge v. SALT RIVER PROJECT AGR. IMP. 893 P.2d 46 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Hayes v. Continental Insurance 872 P.2d 668 Ariz. 1994
Hayes v. Continental Insurance 872 P.2d 668 Ariz. 1994
-61 , -600 (1985) (describing the history of art. 18, § 8 as originally adopted and as amended in 1925).
Dunn v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 866 P.2d 858 Ariz. 1994
Dunn v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 866 P.2d 858 Ariz. 1994
See Anderson v. Industrial Comm’n
Aitken v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 842 P.2d 1313 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
Aitken v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 842 P.2d 1313 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
§§ 23-906(A) and 23-1022(A)
Connors v. Parsons 818 P.2d 232 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Connors v. Parsons 818 P.2d 232 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
STATUTORY ANALYSIS In Anderson v. Industrial Comm’n, , the court held that a worker’s intentional acceptance of compensation benefits is a statutory waiver of tort remedies against the employer under A.R.S.
Swichtenberg v. Brimer 828 P.2d 1218 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Allen v. Southwest Salt Co. 718 P.2d 1021 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Allen v. Southwest Salt Co. 718 P.2d 1021 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986