Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite In Re the Appeal in Pima County Severance Action No. S-1607, 709 P.2d 871.

56 citing documents.

In Re Termination of Parental Rights as to N.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
In Re Termination of Parental Rights as to N.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Action No. S-1607, see also Michael J., 196 Ariz. at 250–51 ¶¶ 21, 24 (considering an incarcerated parent’s level of support in determining abandonment).
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to E.F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to E.F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Severance Action No. S-1607
Latoya P. v. Dcs, K.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Latoya P. v. Dcs, K.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Severance Action No. S-1607, ).
Roseann R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Roseann R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Severance Action No. S-1607
Gal for P.T. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Gal for P.T. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
v. DCS Decision of the Court Severance Action No. S-1607, ("[T]he juvenile court will be deemed to have made every finding necessary to support the judgment.").
Brionna J. v. Dcs, A.V. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Brionna J. v. Dcs, A.V. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
§ 8-514(B) (DCS must place a child in “the least restrictive type of placement available,” giving preference to placement with a parent); Pima County Severance Action No. S-1607, (“[T]he juvenile court will be deemed to 7 BRIONNA J. v. DCS, A.V.
Alma S. v. Dep't of Child Safety 425 P.3d 1089 Ariz. 2018
Alma S. v. Dep't of Child Safety 425 P.3d 1089 Ariz. 2018
Severance Action No. S-1607
Logan B. v. Dcs 422 P.3d 1072 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Logan B. v. Dcs 422 P.3d 1072 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Severance Action No. S-1607, In re Maricopa Cty., Juvenile Action No. JS–3594, -85 (App. 1982).
Monica v. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Monica v. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
In addition, “the juvenile court will be deemed to have made every finding necessary to support the judgment.” Matter of Appeal In Pima County Severance Action No. S-1607
Nicole R. v. Dean C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Nicole R. v. Dean C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Severance Action No. S-1607, (failure to pay child support is not abandonment per se, but may be considered).
Ashlee C. v. Dcs, A.T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Ashlee C. v. Dcs, A.T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Severance Action No. S-1607, (“[W]e defer to the judgment of the trial court which had the opportunity to assess the credibility, attitude and condition of the parties at trial.”) (citing Pima Cty.
Shiloh Z. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Shiloh Z. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Severance Action No. S-1607, (“[W]e defer to the judgment of the trial court which had the opportunity to assess the credibility, attitude and condition of the parties at trial.”) (citing Pima Cnty.
William W. v. Brooke S., P.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
William W. v. Brooke S., P.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Father’s actions are more analogous to the facts in Matter of Appeal in Pima County Severance Action No. S-1607, P.2d 871 (1985), in which the supreme court upheld a juvenile court’s severance after noting that although the father had petitioned to further his visitation rights, the petition was dismissed by stipulation and the father “took no further legal action to ensure his visitation rights.” Id.
Calvin B. v. Brittany B. 304 P.3d 1115 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Calvin B. v. Brittany B. 304 P.3d 1115 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
J-87-119, 161 Ariz. at 539 , 779 P.2d at 1278 ; In re Pima County Severance Action S-1607
Bobby G. v. Ades & Allison G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Bobby G. v. Ades & Allison G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Mary Lou C. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 83 P.3d 43 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Mary Lou C. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 83 P.3d 43 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
See Pima County Severance Action No. S-1607, , (citing Maricopa County Juv.
Jesus M. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 53 P.3d 203 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
Jesus M. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 53 P.3d 203 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
See In re Pima County Severance Action No. S-1607, , (where certain facts “sharply disputed,” appellate court “deferfs] to the judgment of the trial court which had the opportunity to assess the credibility, attitude and condition of the parties at trial”); In re Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-8441
Mary Ellen C. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 971 P.2d 1046 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Mary Ellen C. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 971 P.2d 1046 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
1388 , 71 L.Ed.2d 599 (1982); Pima County Severance Action No. S-1607
In re the Appeal in Maricopa County 904 P.2d 1279 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
In re the Appeal in Maricopa County 904 P.2d 1279 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
E.g., Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-501568, , (citing Pima County Severance Action No. S-1607, , ); Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-8441, , 857 P.2d.
Father in Pima County Juvenile Action No. S-114487 v. Adam 876 P.2d 1121 Ariz. 1994
Matter of Pima Cty. Juv. Severance Action 876 P.2d 1121 Ariz. 1994
Father in Pima County Juvenile Action No. S-114487 v. Adam 876 P.2d 1121 Ariz. 1994
Although the quoted language was probably dicta, it closely follows the language of our holding in In re Appeal in Pima County Severance No. S-l607
Matter of Pima Cty. Juv. Severance Action 876 P.2d 1121 Ariz. 1994
Although the quoted language was probably dicta, it closely follows the language of our holding in In re Appeal in Pima County Severance No. S-1607
In re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-501568 869 P.2d 1224 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
In re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-501568 869 P.2d 1224 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
In re Appeal in Pima County Severance Action No. S—1607
In re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Severance Action No. S-114487 881 P.2d 361 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
In re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Severance Action No. S-114487 881 P.2d 361 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
See, e.g., Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-500274, supra; Pima County Juvenile Action No. S-1607, , Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-4283
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-8287 828 P.2d 1245 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-8287 828 P.2d 1245 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Furthermore, the juvenile court will be deemed to have made every finding necessary to support the judgment.” Matter of Appeal in Pima County Severance Action No. S-1607, , (citations omitted); see Appeal in Yavapai County Juvenile Action No. J-9956, (citation omitted).
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-500274 804 P.2d 730 Ariz. 1990
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-500274 804 P.2d 730 Ariz. 1990
Matter of Appeal in Pima County Severance Action No. 1607