Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Olliver/Pilcher Ins., Inc. v. Daniels, 715 P.2d 1218.
- Electronic Payment v. Kennedy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
-
Electronic Payment v. Kennedy
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
See Varsity Gold, ¶ 18 (App. 2002) (geographical provision in covenant not to compete, which encompassed the entire state and contiguous states, was unreasonable, where employee worked only in one portion of one city); Olliver/Pilcher Ins., (holding statewide non-competition covenant unenforceable because plaintiff worked almost entirely in Northern Arizona).
- Whiles v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- Whiles v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- Diazteca v. Palenque Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
Diazteca v. Palenque
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Olliver/Pilcher Ins., (citing with approval James S. Kemper & Co. v. Cox & Assocs., 434 So.2d 1380, 1384 (Ala.
- Quicken Loan v. Beale Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
Quicken Loan v. Beale
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶ 31, (“the court cannot create a new agreement for the parties to uphold the contract”); Olliver/Pilcher Ins., P.2d 1218, 1221 (1986) (“Generally, courts do not rewrite contracts for parties.”).
- Mousa v. Saba 218 P.3d 1038 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
- Mousa v. Saba 218 P.3d 1038 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
- Fearnow v. Ridenour, Swenson, Cleere & Evans, P.C. 138 P.3d 723 Ariz. 2006
- Fearnow v. Ridenour, Swenson, Cleere & Evans, P.C. 138 P.3d 723 Ariz. 2006
- Himes v. Safeway Insurance 66 P.3d 74 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
-
Himes v. Safeway Insurance
66 P.3d 74
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
see also Hackin v. Pioneer Plumbing Supply Co. 10 Ariz.App.
- Bed Mart, Inc. v. Kelley 45 P.3d 1219 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
-
Distinguished
Bed Mart, Inc. v. Kelley
45 P.3d 1219
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
For example, in Olliver/Pilcher Ins., , the restrictive covenant was struck because its statewide scope was overly broad and unreasonably restricted the right of the employee to work in his chosen occupation, whereas Kelley could continue to sell mattresses or related or similar products at hundreds of stores in the Phoeni
- Varsity Gold, Inc. v. Porzio 45 P.3d 352 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
-
Varsity Gold, Inc. v. Porzio
45 P.3d 352
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
at ¶ 30, (quoting Olliver/Pilcher, Ins., , ).
- Valley Medical Specialists v. Farber 982 P.2d 1277 Ariz. 1999
- Valley Medical Specialists v. Farber 982 P.2d 1277 Ariz. 1999
- Hilb, Rogal & Hamilton Co. of Arizona, Inc. v. McKinney 946 P.2d 464 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
- Hilb, Rogal & Hamilton Co. of Arizona, Inc. v. McKinney 946 P.2d 464 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
- Phoenix Orthopaedic Surgeons, Ltd. v. Peairs 790 P.2d 752 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
- Phoenix Orthopaedic Surgeons, Ltd. v. Peairs 790 P.2d 752 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
- Bryceland v. Northey 772 P.2d 36 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
- Bryceland v. Northey 772 P.2d 36 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
- Alpha Tax Services, Inc. v. Stuart 761 P.2d 1073 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
-
Alpha Tax Services, Inc. v. Stuart
761 P.2d 1073
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Olliver/Pilcher Insurance
- Mattison v. Johnston 730 P.2d 286 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
-
Mattison v. Johnston
730 P.2d 286
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Olliver/Pilcher Ins., Inc., v. Daniels
- Amex Distributing Co., Inc. v. Mascari 724 P.2d 596 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
-
Amex Distributing Co., Inc. v. Mascari
724 P.2d 596
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
One of our tasks is to apply principles expressed by our supreme court in Olliver/Pilcher Insurance