Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Bain v. SUPER. CT. IN AND FOR MARICOPA CTY., 714 P.2d 824.
-
Blazek v. Superior Court
869 P.2d 509
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
334 n. 1, , 827 n. 1 (1986).
- State Ex Rel. Romley v. Superior Court 836 P.2d 445 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
- State Ex Rel. Romley v. Superior Court 836 P.2d 445 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
- Styers v. SUPERIOR COURT IN & FOR CTY. OF MOHAVE 779 P.2d 352 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
-
Styers v. SUPERIOR COURT IN & FOR CTY. OF MOHAVE
779 P.2d 352
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
that a party has “consented to disclosure of [privileged] information *479 and has thereby waived the psychologist-patient privilege” if he has either (1) expressly waived the privilege in writing or in open court testimony; or (2) has pursued a course of conduct inconsistent with obse
- Duquette v. Superior Court 778 P.2d 634 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
-
Duquette v. Superior Court
778 P.2d 634
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
the Arizona Supreme Court stated that when a plaintiff “places a particular medical condition at issue by means of a claim or affirmative defense, ...
- Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. Superior Court 764 P.2d 759 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
- Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. Superior Court 764 P.2d 759 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
- Danielson v. Superior Court 754 P.2d 1145 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
- Danielson v. Superior Court 754 P.2d 1145 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
- Quadrone v. Pasco Petroleum Co., Inc. 752 P.2d 504 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
-
Quadrone v. Pasco Petroleum Co., Inc.
752 P.2d 504
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
However, in an unrelated case, our supreme court has held that “the claim for loss of consortium is personal to the spouse of the injured person.”
- State v. Tallabas 746 P.2d 491 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
-
State v. Tallabas
746 P.2d 491
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
where, as it extended Throop’s holding to the psychologist-patient privilege, the supreme court explained that waiver is implied only as to records and treatment concerning the specific medical or emotional condition placed in issue.
- State v. Turrentine 730 P.2d 238 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
-
State v. Turrentine
730 P.2d 238
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Baine v. Superior Court of the State of Arizona, in and for the County of Maricopa