Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Dancing Sunshines Lounge v. Industrial Commission, 720 P.2d 81.

77 citing documents.

In Re the Commitment of Conn 85 P.3d 474 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
In Re the Commitment of Conn 85 P.3d 474 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Comm’n, -83 , -84 (1986).
Commitment of Jerry Michael Conn Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Comm’n, -83, -84 (1986).
State v. Fulminante 975 P.2d 75 Ariz. 1999
State v. Fulminante 975 P.2d 75 Ariz. 1999
The law of the case will not be applied if “the issue was not actually decided in the first decision or the decision is ambiguous.” Dancing Sunshines Lounge v. Industrial Comm’n
Johnson v. Mofford 975 P.2d 130 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Johnson v. Mofford 975 P.2d 130 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Law of the case has no application where “the issue was not actually decided in the first decision____” Dancing *547 Sunshines Lounge v. Industrial Comm’n
Martinez v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 962 P.2d 903 Ariz. 1998
Martinez v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 962 P.2d 903 Ariz. 1998
[or] the issue was not actually decided in the first decision or the decision is ambiguous.” Dancing Sunshines Lounge v. Industrial Comm’n
State v. King 883 P.2d 1024 Ariz. 1994
State v. King 883 P.2d 1024 Ariz. 1994
Love, 121 Ariz. at 73 , 588 P.2d at 366 ; see also Dancing Sunshines Lounge v. Industrial Comm’n
Paul R. Peterson Construction, Inc. v. Arizona State Carpenters Health & Welfare Trust Fund 880 P.2d 694 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Paul R. Peterson Construction, Inc. v. Arizona State Carpenters Health & Welfare Trust Fund 880 P.2d 694 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
See, e.g., Dancing Sunshines Lounge v. Industrial Comm’n, , (law of the case does not apply where “there has been a change in the applicable law”); (law of the case doctrine inapplicable “where the policy of the law has been changed, by legislative enactment or decision of a higher cou
Powell-Cerkoney v. TCR-Montana Ranch Joint Venture 860 P.2d 1328 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Powell-Cerkoney v. TCR-Montana Ranch Joint Venture 860 P.2d 1328 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Kadish v. Arizona State Land Department 868 P.2d 335 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Kadish v. Arizona State Land Department 868 P.2d 335 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Dancing Sunshines Lounge v. Industrial Comm’n of Arizona
Espinosa v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 824 P.2d 750 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Espinosa v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 824 P.2d 750 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
See, e.g., Dancing Sunshines Lounge v. Industrial Comm’n
Leo Eisenberg & Co., Inc. v. Payson 785 P.2d 49 Ariz. 1989
Leo Eisenberg & Co., Inc. v. Payson 785 P.2d 49 Ariz. 1989
Dancing Sunshines Lounge v. Industrial Comm’n, , , *534 11-12
State Ex Rel. McDougall v. Tvedt 787 P.2d 1077 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
State Ex Rel. McDougall v. Tvedt 787 P.2d 1077 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
E.g., Dancing Sunshines Lounge v. Industrial Comm’n
Lindsey v. University of Arizona 754 P.2d 1152 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Lindsey v. University of Arizona 754 P.2d 1152 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Snow v. Western Savings & Loan Ass'n 730 P.2d 204 Ariz. 1987
Snow v. Western Savings & Loan Ass'n 730 P.2d 204 Ariz. 1987