Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Mumbaugh, 491 P.2d 443.
- State v. Doody 930 P.2d 440 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
-
State v. Doody
930 P.2d 440
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
in language the defendant could comprehend and on which he could intelligently act.”
- State v. Morse 617 P.2d 1141 Ariz. 1980
-
State v. Morse
617 P.2d 1141
Ariz. 1980
cf. Lowe v. United States, 407 F.2d 1391 (9th Cir. 1969)
- State v. Garrison 585 P.2d 563 Ariz. 1978
- State v. Garrison 585 P.2d 563 Ariz. 1978
- State v. Ramirez 569 P.2d 201 Ariz. 1977
- State v. Ramirez 569 P.2d 201 Ariz. 1977
- State v. Kennedy 570 P.2d 508 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
-
State v. Kennedy
570 P.2d 508
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
In support of this proposition they cite the following cases: , , , and State v. Tellez, 6 Ariz.App.
- State v. Moreno 556 P.2d 14 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
- State v. Moreno 556 P.2d 14 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
- State v. Travis 545 P.2d 986 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
- State v. Travis 545 P.2d 986 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
- State v. Brosie 540 P.2d 136 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
- State v. Brosie 540 P.2d 136 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
- State v. Hocker 541 P.2d 419 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
- State v. Hocker 541 P.2d 419 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
- State v. Taylor 537 P.2d 938 Ariz. 1975
- State v. Humphrey 531 P.2d 1142 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
- State v. Humphrey 531 P.2d 1142 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
- State v. Rhodes 508 P.2d 764 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
- State v. Rhodes 508 P.2d 764 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
- State v. Bainch 505 P.2d 248 Ariz. 1973
- State v. Bainch 505 P.2d 248 Ariz. 1973
- State v. Melot 502 P.2d 1346 Ariz. 1972
-
State v. Melot
502 P.2d 1346
Ariz. 1972
We have established that determination of whether custody exists is made “by an analysis of the relevant circumstances with particular attention to probable cause gauged by the ‘reasonable man’ test.”