Cited by

of Regents, (finding public purpose where the operations of a recipient of public funds were “still subject to the control and supervision of public officials,” so “the fear of private gain or exploitation of public funds envisioned by the drafters of our constitution [was] absent”); Walled Lake Door Co., 107 Ariz. at

of Regents, (stating that although perpetuating an educational relationship between a hospital and a university’s medical school is nonpecuniary, “it nonetheless may be viewed as consideration” for Gift Clause purposes).

of Regents, (stating "no earnings of the nonprofit corporation, other than reasonable compensation for services, shall be distributed to the corporation's members, directors or officers"), with distributions including "a direct or indirect transfer of money or other property or incurrence of indebtedness by a corporat

See Gipson, 214 Ariz. at 146 ¶¶ 25–26; In 2 to find a duty based on public policy.

of Regents, (“Public funds .

of Regents, -21 , -80 (1986) (internal quotations, emphasis, and citations omitted); Wistuber v. Paradise Valley Unified Sch.

of Regents, , (hospital and leased underlying land).

of Regents, (hospital and leased underlying land).

P.2d 478 (1986), as engrafting a third requirement onto the Wistuber test: Under “the realities of the transaction,” the challenged governmental expenditure must not “unduly promot[e] private interests.” Turken, 220 Ariz. at 467 ¶ 33, 207 P.3d at 720.

of Regents, -21 , -80 (1986); Wistuber v. Paradise Valley Unified Sch.

of Regents, -21 , -80 (1986)