Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite HOWARD FRANK, MD, PC v. Superior Court, 722 P.2d 955.

28 citing documents.

Martin v. Staheli 457 P.3d 53 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Martin v. Staheli 457 P.3d 53 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
v. Superior Court, (“It is apparent .
Estate of Desela v. Prescott Unified School District No. 1 249 P.3d 767 Ariz. 2011
Estate of Desela v. Prescott Unified School District No. 1 249 P.3d 767 Ariz. 2011
v. Superior Court, , (recognizing parents’ cause of action for loss of consortium with adult child).
Kaufman v. Langhofer 222 P.3d 272 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Kaufman v. Langhofer 222 P.3d 272 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Barnes, 192 Ariz. at 286 , 964 P.2d at 487 (spouses); Villareal v. State Dep’t of Transp., , (parents); , (children).
Lingel v. Olbin 8 P.3d 1163 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
Lingel v. Olbin 8 P.3d 1163 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
Barnes v. Outlaw 964 P.2d 484 Ariz. 1998
Barnes v. Outlaw 964 P.2d 484 Ariz. 1998
Burnham v. Miller 972 P.2d 645 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Burnham v. Miller 972 P.2d 645 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
v. Superior Court, , (parents may recover loss-of-consortium damages related to the severe injury of their adult child).
Knauss v. DND Neffson Co. 963 P.2d 271 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
Knauss v. DND Neffson Co. 963 P.2d 271 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
v. Superior Court, , (also noting that A.R.S.
Miller v. Westcor Ltd. Partnership 831 P.2d 386 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Miller v. Westcor Ltd. Partnership 831 P.2d 386 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Stillman v. American Family Insurance 785 P.2d 114 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Stillman v. American Family Insurance 785 P.2d 114 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
v. Superior Court, , (parents of adult children); , (parents of minor children); , (spouses).
Pierce v. Casas Adobes Baptist Church 782 P.2d 1162 Ariz. 1989
Pierce v. Casas Adobes Baptist Church 782 P.2d 1162 Ariz. 1989
v. Superior Court, , this Court recognized the parents’ claim for loss of consortium of an adult child when a negligent administration of anesthesia during surgery resulted in permanent and severe brain damage.
Villareal v. State, Dept. of Transp. 774 P.2d 213 Ariz. 1989
Villareal v. State, Dept. of Transp. 774 P.2d 213 Ariz. 1989
Pierce v. Casas Adobes Baptist Church 782 P.2d 1166 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Pierce v. Casas Adobes Baptist Church 782 P.2d 1166 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Appellants rely on two Arizona cases in support of their argument
Campbell v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona 745 P.2d 160 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Campbell v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona 745 P.2d 160 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Although the phrase “loss of consortium” is probably not familiar to most members of the lay public, consortium means “love, affection, protection, support, services, companionship, care, society, and in the marital relationship, sexual relations.” , 229 n. 1, , 956 n. 1 (1986), citing Note, The Child’s Claim for Loss of Consortium Damages: A Logical and Sympathetic Appeal, 13 S.D.L.Rev.
Ambrose v. Illinois-California Express, Inc. 729 P.2d 331 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Ambrose v. Illinois-California Express, Inc. 729 P.2d 331 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986