Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Marcus v. Fox, 723 P.2d 682.

96 citing documents.

Bennett James L. Bennett Money Purchase Pension Plan Meyerstein v. Baxter Group Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
Bennett James L. Bennett Money Purchase Pension Plan Meyerstein v. Baxter Group Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
See, Sparks v. Republic Nat’l Life Ins.
Keystone Floor & More, LLC v. Arizona Registrar of Contractors 219 P.3d 237 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Keystone Floor & More, LLC v. Arizona Registrar of Contractors 219 P.3d 237 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
To do so, we must look to “the nature of the action and the surrounding circumstances,” Ramsey, 198 Ariz. at 14, ¶ 21 , 6 P.3d at 319 ( , ).
Anderson v. Contes 128 P.3d 239 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Anderson v. Contes 128 P.3d 239 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
(remanding to the trial court “for further proceedings” to clarify the basis for its decision denying attorneys’ fees), , (remanding for a new hearing because the evidence was insufficient to support the particular child
Chaurasia v. General Motors Corp. 126 P.3d 165 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Chaurasia v. General Motors Corp. 126 P.3d 165 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
We must examine the nature of the action and the surrounding circumstances to determine whether the claim is one “arising out of a contract.” , (citation omitted).
Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc. 6 P.3d 315 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc. 6 P.3d 315 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
¶ 21 In applying the Sparks test, a court is not limited to the “form of the pleadings,” but should look to “the nature of the action and the surrounding circumstances to determine whether the claim is one ‘arising out of a contract.’ ”
Schwab Sales, Inc. v. GN Const. Co., Inc. 992 P.2d 1128 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
Schwab Sales, Inc. v. GN Const. Co., Inc. 992 P.2d 1128 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
A.H. v. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund 950 P.2d 1147 Ariz. 1997
A.H. v. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund 950 P.2d 1147 Ariz. 1997
Alta Vista Plaza, Ltd. v. Insulation Specialists Co. 919 P.2d 176 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
Alta Vista Plaza, Ltd. v. Insulation Specialists Co. 919 P.2d 176 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
Examples of unliquidated *83 claims are attorney’s fees, , benefit-of-the-bargain damages, , vacated in part by , punitive damages, Lake Havasu Community Hosp., Inc., and the reasonable value of landlord improvements, Trollope v. Koerner, 21 Ariz.App.
Deutsche Credit Corp. v. Case Power & Equipment Co. 876 P.2d 1190 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Deutsche Credit Corp. v. Case Power & Equipment Co. 876 P.2d 1190 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
O'KEEFE v. Grenke 825 P.2d 985 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
O'KEEFE v. Grenke 825 P.2d 985 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
also cited by interpleaders.
Fund Manager v. Corbin 778 P.2d 1244 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Fund Manager v. Corbin 778 P.2d 1244 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Bar J Bar Cattle Co., Inc. v. Pace 763 P.2d 545 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Bar J Bar Cattle Co., Inc. v. Pace 763 P.2d 545 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Restatement (Second) of Torts § 766B , in concluding that it “may” have had discretion to award fees.
Pointe Resorts, Inc. v. Culbertson 761 P.2d 1041 Ariz. 1988
Pointe Resorts, Inc. v. Culbertson 761 P.2d 1041 Ariz. 1988
London v. Green Acres Trust 765 P.2d 538 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
London v. Green Acres Trust 765 P.2d 538 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
1612 , 44 L.Ed.2d 141 (1975); , Sellinger v. Freeway Mobile Home Sales, Inc.
Emergency Medical Transport, Inc. v. City of Tempe 756 P.2d 929 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Emergency Medical Transport, Inc. v. City of Tempe 756 P.2d 929 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
[ ] (1986), since the validity of a contract was in question here.
Morris v. Achen Const. Co., Inc. 747 P.2d 1211 Ariz. 1987
Morris v. Achen Const. Co., Inc. 747 P.2d 1211 Ariz. 1987
Haldiman v. Gosnell Development Corp. 748 P.2d 1209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Haldiman v. Gosnell Development Corp. 748 P.2d 1209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
See also, , , Western Technologies, Inc. v. Sverdrup & Parcel, Inc., -9 , -26 (App.1986).
Marcus v. Fox 747 P.2d 1223 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Marcus v. Fox 747 P.2d 1223 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
McKesson Chemical Co. v. Van Waters & Rogers 739 P.2d 211 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
McKesson Chemical Co. v. Van Waters & Rogers 739 P.2d 211 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
State Farm Automobile Insurance v. Dressler 738 P.2d 1134 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
State Farm Automobile Insurance v. Dressler 738 P.2d 1134 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Arizona Ammonia of Tucson, Inc. v. Mission Bank 732 P.2d 591 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Arizona Ammonia of Tucson, Inc. v. Mission Bank 732 P.2d 591 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Western Technologies, Inc. v. Sverdrup & Parcel, Inc. 739 P.2d 1318 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Western Technologies, Inc. v. Sverdrup & Parcel, Inc. 739 P.2d 1318 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
-36 , -85 (1986); -62 , -89 (1986).
USLife Title Co. of Arizona v. Gutkin 732 P.2d 579 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
USLife Title Co. of Arizona v. Gutkin 732 P.2d 579 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986