Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Wagner v. City of Globe, 722 P.2d 250.

33 citing documents.

BLUNT v. TOWN OF GILBERT Ariz. 2026
Eva Cornell v. Desert Financial Credit Union Ariz. 2023
Eva Cornell v. Desert Financial Credit Union Ariz. 2023
Id.; (“[B]ilateral contract[s] .
Scorzo v. Az med/state Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Scorzo v. Az med/state Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Int'l, Inc., ¶ 15, ( ); see also Murcott v. Best W. Int'l, Inc., ¶ 41, ( P.2d 250 (1986) and Wagenseller).
Higgins v. Assmann Electronics, Inc. 173 P.3d 453 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Higgins v. Assmann Electronics, Inc. 173 P.3d 453 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
(holding that it is a jury question whether one can infer that a principal affirms an unauthorized act by failing “to repudiate it, especially where one would naturally be expected to speak if he did not consent.
Galati v. America West Airlines, Inc. 69 P.3d 1011 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Galati v. America West Airlines, Inc. 69 P.3d 1011 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
¶ 11 In support of his claim that federal regulations should be included under the umbrella of public policy, Galati cites Wagenseller, , ; , , depublished
Roberson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 44 P.3d 164 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Roberson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 44 P.3d 164 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
¶ 16 Because an at-will employment relationship is contractual, however, “the parties are free to create a different relationship beyond one at will ‘and define the parameters of that relationship, based upon the totality of their statements and actions.’ ” ¶ 12 , ( , ).
Taylor v. Graham County Chamber of Commerce 33 P.3d 518 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
Taylor v. Graham County Chamber of Commerce 33 P.3d 518 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
Cummins v. Mold-In Graphic Systems 26 P.3d 518 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Cummins v. Mold-In Graphic Systems 26 P.3d 518 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Murcott v. Best Western International, Inc. 9 P.3d 1088 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Murcott v. Best Western International, Inc. 9 P.3d 1088 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
In Wagner v. City of Globe, the Arizona Supreme Court described a whistle-blower as an employee “who exposes wrongdoing on the part of his employer and is then discharged.”
Demasse v. ITT Corp. 984 P.2d 1138 Ariz. 1999
Demasse v. ITT Corp. 984 P.2d 1138 Ariz. 1999
Demasse v. ITT Corp. 984 P.2d 1138 Ariz. 1999
(citing 1A A. Corbin, Corbin on Contracts § 152, at 13-14 (1963)).
Demasse v. ITT Corp. 984 P.2d 1138 Ariz. 1999
(citing 1A A. CORBIN, CORBIN ON CONTRACTS § 152, at 13-14 (1963)).
Lloyd v. AMF Bowling Centers, Inc. 985 P.2d 629 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Lloyd v. AMF Bowling Centers, Inc. 985 P.2d 629 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Hall Family Properties, Ltd. v. Gosnell Development Corp. 916 P.2d 1098 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Hall Family Properties, Ltd. v. Gosnell Development Corp. 916 P.2d 1098 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Duncan v. St. Joseph's Hospital & Medical Center 903 P.2d 1107 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Duncan v. St. Joseph's Hospital & Medical Center 903 P.2d 1107 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Hosp., , , the court concluded: The dispute centers around two letters from Joseph J. DeSilva, dated May 25, 1989 and November 3, 1989 that arguably create the inference that the new position for which [Duncan] was hired was to last “the next several years” or “over the next few years.” It is the view of t
Nelson v. Phoenix Resort Corp. 888 P.2d 1375 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Nelson v. Phoenix Resort Corp. 888 P.2d 1375 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Dorrance v. Valley National Bank 797 P.2d 701 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Dorrance v. Valley National Bank 797 P.2d 701 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
In support of his argument
Douglas v. Wilson 774 P.2d 1356 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Douglas v. Wilson 774 P.2d 1356 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
On appeal, Wilson contends that Douglas has failed to establish a causal relationship between the condition or circumstances and her termination

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by