Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Turner, 455 P.2d 443.
- State v. Pereida 825 P.2d 975 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
-
State v. Pereida
825 P.2d 975
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
1496, 1501 , 99 L.Ed.2d 771, 782 (1988)
- State v. Serna 807 P.2d 1109 Ariz. 1991
-
State v. Serna
807 P.2d 1109
Ariz. 1991
-72 , -46 (1969) (citation omitted) (emphasis added).
- State v. Korte 566 P.2d 318 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
-
State v. Korte
566 P.2d 318
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
Nees v. Culbertson, 406 F.2d 621 (5th Cir. 1969); , (dictum).
- State v. Jaramillo 522 P.2d 1079 Ariz. 1974
-
State v. Jaramillo
522 P.2d 1079
Ariz. 1974
State v. Phillips, supra; State v. Hughes, supra
- State v. Cox 522 P.2d 29 Ariz. 1974
- State v. Cox 522 P.2d 29 Ariz. 1974
- State v. Petralia 521 P.2d 617 Ariz. 1974
- State v. Petralia 521 P.2d 617 Ariz. 1974
- State v. Moore 519 P.2d 1145 Ariz. 1974
-
State v. Moore
519 P.2d 1145
Ariz. 1974
and State v. McGee, 194 Kan.
- State v. Brewer 507 P.2d 1009 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
- State v. Brewer 507 P.2d 1009 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
- State v. Jacobs 503 P.2d 826 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
-
State v. Jacobs
503 P.2d 826
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
State v. Washington, supra; State v. Hughes, supra; State v. Hays, supra; State v. Waits, supra.
- State v. Hall 504 P.2d 534 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
- State v. Hall 504 P.2d 534 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
- State v. Reynolds 503 P.2d 369 Ariz. 1972
- State v. Reynolds 503 P.2d 369 Ariz. 1972
- State v. Hays 496 P.2d 628 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
- State v. Hays 496 P.2d 628 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
- State v. Tacon 488 P.2d 973 Ariz. 1971
- State v. Tacon 488 P.2d 973 Ariz. 1971
- State v. Moreno 483 P.2d 786 Ariz. 1971
-
State v. Moreno
483 P.2d 786
Ariz. 1971
“Denial of a Motion for a New Trial will not be grounds for reversal unless it affirmatively appears that the court abused its discretion, and acted arbitrarily.”
- State v. Kidwell 475 P.2d 241 Ariz. 1970
-
State v. Kidwell
475 P.2d 241
Ariz. 1970
The test we must apply has been stated by this Court to be as follows: “On an appeal from an order denying a new trial to the defendant in a criminal case, the matter is largely one of discretion with the trial court, and the denial will not be grounds for reversal unless it appears affirmatively that the court abused its discretion, and acted arbitrarily.” at 471 , at 445 (1969)
- State v. Mason 466 P.2d 760 Ariz. 1970
- State v. Mason 466 P.2d 760 Ariz. 1970