Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Leon, 451 P.2d 878.

2476 citing documents.

State v. Gardner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Heydorn Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
M O R S E, Judge: ¶1 This appeal is filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Gardner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
B E E N E, Judge: ¶1 This appeal was filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Martinez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Therefore, in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), defense counsel asks this Court to search the record for fundamental error.
State v. Daniels Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Daniels Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
S W A N N, Judge: ¶1 This is an appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), from Peter Joseph Daniels III’s convictions and sentences for two counts of aggravated assault and one count of criminal damage.
State v. Balbastro Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Gonzales Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Ornelas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Balbastro Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
M O R S E, Judge: ¶1 This appeal is filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Ornelas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
T H O M P S O N, Judge: ¶1 This appeal was timely filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), following Steve Munoz Ornelas’s (defendant’s) conviction for one count of facilitation to commit theft of means of transportation, a class 6 felony.
State v. Gonzales Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
After searching the record on appeal and finding no arguable question of law that was not frivolous, Gonzales’ counsel filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), asking this Court to search the record for reversible error.
State v. Kroll Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Isom Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Kroll Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
B E E N E, Judge: ¶1 This appeal was timely filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) following the superior court’s finding that Roger Calvin Kroll violated a term of his probation.
State v. Isom Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
T H O M P S O N, Judge: ¶1 This appeal was timely filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), following Kevin Andrew Isom’s (defendant’s) conviction for one count of aggravated assault against a police officer, a class 5 felony, and one count of aggravated assault against a police officer, a class 3 felony.
State v. Henderson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Dawson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Henderson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Henderson’s counsel filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), certifying that, after a diligent search of the record, he found no arguable question of law that was not frivolous.
State v. Dawson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
After searching the record on appeal and finding no arguable question of law that was not frivolous, Dawson’s counsel filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), asking this court to search the record for fundamental error.
State v. Hernandez 439 P.3d 1188 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Hernandez 439 P.3d 1188 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
In accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), defense counsel requested we search the record for fundamental error.
State v. Eddins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Jacott Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Jacott Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶6 On appeal, Jacott’s lawyer filed a brief in compliance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Eddins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Appellant’s counsel has filed a brief in accordance with Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259 (2000), Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), stating he has searched the record on appeal and found no arguable question of law that is not frivolous.
State v. Mayes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. McLain Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Mayes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
T H O M P S O N, Judge: ¶1 This appeal was timely filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), following Desman Isaiah Mayes’s (defendant’s) conviction for one count of tampering with physical evidence, a class 6 felony.
State v. McLain Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
After searching the record and finding no arguable, non-frivolous question of law, McLain’s counsel filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), asking this court to search the record for fundamental error.
State v. Martineau Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Mewbourn Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Mewbourn Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
C R U Z, Judge: ¶1 This appeal is filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Martineau Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
C R U Z, Judge: ¶1 Rockney W. Martineau timely filed this appeal in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), following his conviction of attempted fraudulent schemes and artifices, illegally conducting an enterprise, and forgery.
State v. Meegan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Gonzalez-Aguayo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Gonzalez-Aguayo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
H O W E, Judge: ¶1 This appeal is filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Meegan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
B E E N E, Judge: ¶1 This appeal was timely filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) following a disposition hearing for probation violation by Anne-Marie Elizabeth Meegan (“Meegan”) related to her conviction for attempted stalking.
State v. Dean Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Dean Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Dean’s counsel filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), certifying that, after a diligent search of the record, he found no arguable question of law that was not frivolous.
State v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Lira Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Fulton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Lira Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
W I N T H R O P, Judge: ¶1 This appeal is filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Appellant’s counsel filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); stating that she searched the record on appeal and found “no legal error requiring reversal.” Appellant’s counsel therefore requested that we review the record for fundamental error.
State v. Fulton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
In accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) Fulton’s counsel advised this Court that he has found no arguable question of law and requested that we search the record for fundamental error.
State v. Petty Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Kennell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Edlund Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Kennell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
J O H N S E N, Judge: ¶1 Michael Lee Kennell timely filed this appeal in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), following his convictions of possession or use of dangerous drugs and possession or use of narcotic drugs, each a Class 4 felony; and possession of drug paraphernalia, a Class 6 felony.