Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Leon, 451 P.2d 878.

2476 citing documents.

State v. Paulson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Paulson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Irvin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Cruz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Irvin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
B E E N E, Judge: ¶1 This appeal was timely filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) following Leonard Deon Irvin’s (“Irvin”) convictions for possession or use of a narcotic drug, a class 4 felony, and the possession or use of marijuana, a class 6 felony.
State v. Cruz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Defense counsel filed a brief in compliance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), advising us that after searching the record on appeal, he found no meritorious grounds for reversal.
State v. Young Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Lozano-Perez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Young Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
P E R K I N S, Judge: ¶1 Aaron Jackson Young timely filed this appeal in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), after the trial court modified his probation.
State v. Lozano-Perez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
After searching the record on appeal and finding no arguable question of law that was not frivolous, Lozano-Perez’s counsel filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), asking this Court to search the record for fundamental error.
State v. Serrano Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Serrano Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Therefore, in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), defense counsel asks this Court to search the record for fundamental error.
State v. Walters Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Walters Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
B R O W N, Judge: ¶1 This appeal has been presented to us in in compliance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Garcia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Walker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Walker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
T H U M M A, Chief Judge: ¶1 This is an appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Garcia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
J O H N S E N, Judge: ¶1 Simon Sergio Garcia timely filed this appeal in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), following his conviction of theft of a means of transportation, a Class 3 felony.
State v. Jackson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Miramontes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Miramontes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
P E R K I N S, Judge: ¶1 Carlos A. Miramontes timely filed this appeal in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), following his conviction of resisting arrest, a class 6 felony.
State v. Jackson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
After searching the record on appeal and finding no arguable question of law that was not frivolous, Jackson’s counsel filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), asking this court to search the record for reversible error.
State v. Dulin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Zermeno Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Zermeno Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
B R O W N, Judge: ¶1 This appeal is presented to us pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Dulin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Therefore, in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), defense counsel asked this Court to search the record for fundamental error.
State v. Sanchez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Sanchez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sanchez’s counsel filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), certifying that, after a diligent search of the record, he found no arguable question of law that was not frivolous.
State v. Rice Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Rice Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Counsel for Rice filed a brief in compliance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), advising that after searching the record on appeal, he found no meritorious grounds for reversal.
State v. Zamora Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Roberts Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Zamora Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
T H O M P S O N, Judge: ¶1 This case comes to us as an appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Roberts Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Appellant’s counsel has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), stating she has searched the record on appeal and has found no error or arguable question of law.
State v. Boyd Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Boyd Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
H O W E, Judge: ¶1 This appeal is filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Piggee Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Moreno Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Moreno Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Moreno’s counsel filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), certifying that, after a diligent search of the record, he found no arguable question of law that was not frivolous.
State v. Piggee Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
After searching the record on appeal and finding no arguable question of law that was not frivolous, Piggee’s counsel filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), asking this court to search the record for reversible error.
State v. Graff Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Ortega Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Jacquez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Graff Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
In accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), counsel advised the Court that he has searched the entire record and found no arguable question of law, and now requests this Court search the record for fundamental error.
State v. Ortega Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
J O H N S E N, Judge: ¶1 Benny Ortega timely filed this appeal in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), following his conviction of possession of a dangerous drug, a Class 4 felony.
State v. Jacquez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Jacquez’ counsel filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), stating he has searched the record for error but could not identify any “arguable question of law that is not frivolous.” Jacquez’ counsel therefore requests that we review the record for fundamental error.
State v. Jackson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Jackson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
STATE v. JACKSON Decision of the Court T H O M P S O N, Judge: ¶1 This case comes to us as an appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Marks Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Marks Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
B E E N E, Judge: ¶1 This appeal was timely filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) following Anthony Marks’ (“Marks”) convictions for second-degree murder, disorderly conduct, and two counts of aggravated assault.