Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Leon, 451 P.2d 878.

2476 citing documents.

State v. Colorado Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
J O H N S E N, Judge: ¶1 This appeal was timely filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), following Brandon Colorado's convictions of two counts of sexual conduct with a minor, both Class 2 felonies; one count of child molestation, a Class 2 felony; and one count of threatening and intimidating, a Class 1 misdemeanor.
State v. Bartels Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Defendant’s counsel filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), advising this Court that after a search of the entire appellate record, no arguable ground exists for reversal.
State v. Peterkin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Arvallo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Chandler Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Tran Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Peterkin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
J O H N S E N, Judge: ¶1 This appeal was timely filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), following Sharlee Peterkin's conviction of sale or transportation of marijuana, a Class 2 felony.
State v. Chandler Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Chandler’s counsel has filed a brief in accordance with Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259 (2000); Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); P.2d 878 (1969), stating he has searched the record on appeal and found no arguable question of law.
State v. Arvallo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Defendant’s counsel filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), advising this Court that after a search of the entire appellate record, no arguable ground exists for reversal.
State v. Tran Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
P O R T L E Y, Judge: ¶1 This is an appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) P.2d 878 (1969).
State v. Angulo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Porter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Angulo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
P O R T L E Y, Judge: ¶1 This is an appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) P.2d 878 (1969).
State v. Porter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
See Ariz. Rev. Stat. (“A.R.S.”) §§ 13-1904(A)(1) (2010) (armed robbery), -1304(A)(3) (2010) (kidnapping), - 1204(A)(2) (Supp. 2015) (aggravated assault).1 After searching the record on appeal and finding no arguable question of law that was not frivolous, Porter’s counsel filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), P.2d 878 (1969), asking this court to search the record for fundamental error.
State v. Arter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Blackwell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Matta Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Matta Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
T H U M M A, Judge: ¶1 This is an appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Arter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Defendant’s counsel filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), advising this Court that after a search of the entire appellate record, no arguable ground exists for reversal.
State v. Blackwell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), defense counsel has searched the record, found no arguable question of law, and asked this Court to review the record for reversible error.
State v. Ottar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Ottar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Ottar’s counsel has filed a brief in accordance with Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259 (2000); Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); P.2d 878 (1969), stating he has searched the record on appeal and found no arguable question of law.
State v. Clayborn Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Clayborn Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Pursuant to Anders v. Cal., 386 U.S. 738 (1967) Defendant’s counsel has filed a brief indicating she searched the entire record, found no arguable question of law, and asked this court to review the record for fundamental error.
State v. Sanchez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Sanchez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Pursuant to Anders v. Cal., 386 U.S. 738 (1967) Sanchez’s counsel has filed a brief indicating she searched the entire record and finding no arguable question of law, asks this court to review the record for fundamental error.
State v. Falcone Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Lewis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Lewis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
T H U M M A, Judge: ¶1 This is an appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Falcone Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), defense counsel has searched the record, found no arguable question of law, and asked us to review the record for reversible error.
State v. Martinez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Martinez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
e: ¶1 John Joseph Martinez (“Martinez”) appeals his conviction and sentence for participating in a criminal street gang with two prior felony convictions, a class 2 non-dangerous, repetitive felony, in violation of Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 2321 (2010).1 Counsel for Martinez filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. White Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. White Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
White’s counsel filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), certifying that, after a diligent search of the record, he found no arguable question of law that was not frivolous.
State v. King Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Shine Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Zarra Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Crawford Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Zarra Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
J O H N S E N, Judge: ¶1 This appeal was timely filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), following Richard Carl Zarra's convictions of aggravated assault, a Class 4 felony, and resisting arrest, a Class 6 felony.
State v. Crawford Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
STATE v. CRAWFORD Decision of the Court H O W E, Judge: ¶1 This appeal is filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), P.2d 878 (1969).
State v. Shine Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Counsel for Shine filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), advising that after searching the record on appeal, he was unable to find any arguable ground for reversal.
State v. King Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
J O H N S E N, Judge: ¶1 This appeal was timely filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), following Scotti A. King's conviction of aggravated assault by domestic violence, a Class 2 felony; aggravated assault by domestic violence, a Class 6 felony; aggravated assault by domestic violence, a Class 3 felony; and disorderly conduct involving a weapon by domestic violence, a Class 6 felony.
State v. Handley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Caballero Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Handley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
J O H N S E N, Judge: ¶1 This appeal was timely filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), following Shaun M. Handley's conviction of possession or use of a dangerous drug (trifluouromethylphenylpiperazine ("TFMPP")), a Class 4 felony.
State v. Caballero Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
T H O M P S O N, Judge: ¶1 This case comes to us as an appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), P.2d 878 (1969).
State v. Hernandez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Blackwell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Sagarnaga Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Chesson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016