Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Leon, 451 P.2d 878.

2476 citing documents.

State v. Drew Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), P.2d 878 (1969), Drew’s counsel searched the record, found no arguable question of law, and asked that we review the record for reversible error.
State v. Leeds Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
After searching the record on appeal and finding no arguable question of law that was not frivolous, Leeds’ counsel filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967), P.2d 878 (1969), asking this court to search the record for fundamental error.
State v. Ware Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Bradley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Bedoni Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Baker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Bedoni Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
H O W E, Judge: ¶1 This appeal is filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) P.2d 878 (1969).
State v. Bradley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), P.2d 878 (1969), defense counsel has searched the record, found no arguable question of law, and asked that we review the record for reversible error.
State v. Baker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
This is an appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Ware Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Ware’s counsel has filed a brief in accordance with Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259 (2000); Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); P.2d 878 (1969), stating that he has searched the record on appeal and found no arguable question of law that is not frivolous.
State v. Tonyan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Tonyan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Therefore, in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), defense counsel asks this Court to search the record for fundamental error.
State v. Black Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Gorman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Gorman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
P O R T L E Y, Judge: ¶1 This is a consolidated appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) P.2d 878 (1969).
State v. Black Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
T H U M M A, Judge: ¶1 This is an appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) P.2d 878 (1969).
State v. Amina Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Spillman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Spillman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Spillman’s counsel filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), P.2d 878 (1969), certifying that, after a diligent search of the record, he found no arguable question of law that was not frivolous.
State v. Amina Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
ction and sentence for aggravated assault, a class 3 dangerous felony, in violation of Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 13-1204 (Supp. 2014).1 After searching the record on appeal and finding no arguable question of law that was not frivolous, Amina’s counsel filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967), P.2d 878 (1969), asking this court to search the record for fundamental error.
State v. White Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Griffith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Griffith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶2 This case comes to us as an appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. White Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), P.2d 878 (1969), counsel for defendant has advised us that, after searching the entire record, he has been unable to discover any arguable questions of law and has filed a brief requesting this court to conduct an Anders review of the record.
State v. Ganea Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Young Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Valero Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Therefore, in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), defense counsel asks this Court to search the record for fundamental error.
State v. Ganea Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Appellant’s counsel has filed a brief in accordance with Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259 (2000); Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); P.2d 878 (1969), stating that he has searched the record on appeal and found no arguable question of law that is not frivolous.
State v. Valero Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Defendant’s counsel filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), P.2d 878 (1969), advising us that, after searching the record, she has been unable to discover any arguable questions of law.
State v. Young Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Therefore, in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), defense counsel asks this Court to search the record for fundamental error.
State v. Jude Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Castillo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Emerson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Jude Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Jude’s counsel filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) advising this court that after a search of the entire appellate record, no arguable question of law was found.
State v. Emerson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Appellant’s counsel filed a brief in accordance with Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259 (2000); Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); P.2d 878 (1969), indicating he searched the record on appeal and, finding no arguable question of law that was not frivolous, requested this court to review the entire record for fundamental error.
State v. Castillo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), P.2d 878 (1969), defense counsel has searched the record, found no arguable question of law, and asked that we review the record for reversible error.
State v. Guinard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Powell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Soto Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Soto Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Soto’s counsel filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), P.2d 878 (1969), certifying that, after a diligent search of the record, she found no arguable question of law that was not frivolous.
State v. Powell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Defendant’s counsel filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), advising this Court that after a search of the entire appellate record, no arguable ground exists for reversal.
State v. Guinard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
After searching the record on appeal and finding no arguable question of law that was not frivolous, Guinard’s counsel filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967), P.2d 878 (1969), asking this court to search the record for fundamental error.
State v. Delgado-Paredes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Delgado-Paredes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Delgado-Paredes’s counsel filed a brief in compliance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), stating that he has searched the record and found no arguable question of law and requesting that this court examine the record for reversible error.
State v. Mendiola Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Sanchez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Mendiola Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Mendiola’s counsel filed a brief in compliance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), stating that she has searched the record and found no arguable question of law and requesting that this court examine the record for reversible error.
State v. Sanchez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Sanchez’s counsel filed a brief in compliance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), stating that she has searched the record and found no arguable question of law and requesting that this court examine the record for reversible error.