Cited by

See Brookover v. Roberts Enters., Inc., ¶ 16 n.1 (App. 2007) (“This court, however, may not consider evidence not before the trial court when it considered its ruling.”); ¶ 13 (App. 2000) (explaining that appellate courts will generally “not consider issues, even constitutional issues, raised for

DISCUSSION ¶11 This court reviews a grant of summary judgment de novo, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to McLaren, ¶ 12 (2003) (citing cases), to determine “whether any genuine issues of material fact exist,” Brookover v. Roberts Enters., Inc., ¶ 8 (App. 2007).

Brookover v. Roberts Enters., Inc., ¶ 17 n.2 (App. 2007).

See Brookover v. Roberts Enters., Inc., ¶ 17 n.2 (App. 2007) (noting that review of summary judgment is limited to the evidence before the superior court when ruling, not additional evidence first presented in a motion for reconsideration).

See Brookover v. Roberts Enters., Inc., ¶ 17 n.2 (App. 2007).

This court reviews the entry of summary judgment de novo, “viewing the evidence and reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion,” ¶ 12 (2003), to determine “whether any genuine issues of material fact exist,” Brookover v. Roberts Enter., Inc., ¶ 8 (App. 2007).

Co., ¶ 14 (App. 2014); Brookover v. Roberts Enters., Inc., ¶ 17 n.2 (App. 2007) (noting that review of summary judgment is limited to evidence before the superior court when ruling, not additional evidence first presented in a motion for reconsideration).

¶10 We will therefore review the validity of the judgment de novo, “viewing the evidence and reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion,” ¶ 12 (2003), to determine “whether any genuine issues of material fact exist,” Brookover v. Roberts Enters., Inc., ¶ 8 (App. 2007).

¶14 This court reviews de novo a grant of summary judgment, “viewing the evidence and reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion,” ¶ 12 (2003), to determine “whether any genuine issues of material fact exist,” Brookover v. Roberts Enters., Inc., ¶ 8 (App. 2007).

¶14 This court reviews de novo a grant of summary judgment, “viewing the evidence and reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion,” ¶ 12 (2003), to determine “whether any genuine issues of material fact exist,” Brookover v. Roberts Enters., Inc., ¶ 8 (App. 2007).

¶ 8 (App. 2007); see generally Ariz. R. Civ.

¶ 8 (App. 2007) (citation omitted).

DISCUSSION ¶8 This court reviews the entry of summary judgment de novo, “viewing the evidence and reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion,” ¶ 12 (2003), to determine “whether any genuine issues of material fact exist,” Brookover v. Roberts Enters., Inc., ¶ 8 (App. 2007).

¶ 8 (App. 2007) (citation omitted).

The court “view[s] the evidence and reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion,” ¶ 12 (2003), to determine “whether any genuine issues of material fact exist,” Brookover v. Roberts Enters., Inc., ¶ 8 (App. 2007).

P. 16.1(d); Brookover v. Roberts Enterprises, Inc., ¶ 17 n.2 (App. 2007) (noting in dicta that this court seldom considers new arguments or evidence presented for the first time to the superior court in a motion to reconsider).

We further “review the decision on the record made in the trial court, considering only the evidence presented to the trial court when it addressed the motion.” ¶ 8 (App. 2007).

DISCUSSION ¶7 This court reviews the entry of summary judgment de novo, “viewing the evidence and reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion,” ¶ 12 (2003), to determine “whether any genuine issues of material fact exist,” Brookover v. Roberts Enter., Inc., ¶ 8 (App. 2007).

This court reviews the grant of summary judgment de novo, “viewing the evidence and reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion,” ¶ 12 (2003), to determine “whether any genuine issues of material fact exist,” Brookover v. Roberts Enter., Inc., ¶ 8 (App. 2007).

See Brookover v. Roberts Enters., Inc., ¶ 16, n.1 (App. 2007) (superior court only considers evidence presented at trial).

The entry of summary judgment is reviewed de novo, “viewing the evidence and reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion,” ¶ 12 (2003), to determine “whether any genuine issues of material fact exist and whether the [superior] court properly applied the law,” Brookover v. Roberts Enters., Inc., ¶ 8 (App. 2007).

The court “view[s] the evidence and reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion,” ¶ 12 (2003), to determine “whether any genuine issues of material fact exist,” Brookover v. Roberts Enter., Inc., ¶ 8 (App. 2007).