Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Lloyd v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance, 943 P.2d 729.

36 citing documents.

WAGNER v. ARIZONA MUNICIPAL Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
WAGNER v. ARIZONA MUNICIPAL Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
Lewis v. Rehkow Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Lewis v. Rehkow Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Kennedy v. Wybenga Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Kennedy v. Wybenga Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Miller v. Miller Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Miller v. Miller Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Co., – 75 (App. 1996); see also A.R.S.
Alicia H. v. Ades Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Alicia H. v. Ades Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Co., (noting this court may, in its discretion, accept special action jurisdiction when we do not have appellate jurisdiction to review an issue).
KOOL RADIATORS, INC. v. Evans 278 P.3d 310 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
KOOL RADIATORS, INC. v. Evans 278 P.3d 310 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Catalina Foothills Unif. Sch. Distr. No. 16 v. La Paloma Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
Catalina Foothills Unif. Sch. Distr. No. 16 v. La Paloma Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
Co., -75, -35 (App. 1996).
City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. 181 P.3d 219 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. 181 P.3d 219 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Co., -75 , -35 (App. 1996) (court of appeals exercises discretion to treat appeal as a petition for special action and accept special action jurisdiction where trial court improperly certified partial summary judgment pursuant to Rule 54(b), Ariz. R. Civ.
State of Arizona v. Patrick James Soriano 176 P.3d 44 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
State of Arizona v. Patrick James Soriano 176 P.3d 44 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Co., -75, -35 (App. 1996) (treating premature appeal from partial summary judgment as special action).
Ruesga v. Kindred Nursing Centers West, L.L.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Ruesga v. Kindred Nursing Centers West, L.L.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Joon Nae Kim v. Mansoori 153 P.3d 1086 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Joon Nae Kim v. Mansoori 153 P.3d 1086 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
GRAND v. NACCHIO McMASTER And QWEST COMMUNICATIONS Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
GRAND v. NACCHIO McMASTER And QWEST COMMUNICATIONS Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Co. , -75 , -35 (App. 1996) (same); see also A.R.S.
Danielson v. Evans 36 P.3d 749 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
Danielson v. Evans 36 P.3d 749 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
Manterola v. Farmers Insurance Exchange 30 P.3d 639 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
Manterola v. Farmers Insurance Exchange 30 P.3d 639 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
Co., , 377 n. 4, , 737 n. 4 (App. 1996)____ An insurer, however, “can be held liable for bad faith even when it does not violate any express provision of the insurance contract.” Lloyd, 189 Ariz. at 377 , 943 P.2d at 737 ....
Rowland v. Great States Insurance 20 P.3d 1158 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
Rowland v. Great States Insurance 20 P.3d 1158 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
Co., , 377 n. 4, , 737 n. 4 (App.1996).
Leal v. Allstate Insurance 17 P.3d 95 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Leal v. Allstate Insurance 17 P.3d 95 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Co., , (insurer owes duty of good faith to its insureds if it assumes their defense although the insurance contract does not actually cover the incident).
Mora v. Phoenix Indemnity Insurance 996 P.2d 116 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Mora v. Phoenix Indemnity Insurance 996 P.2d 116 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Voland v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona 943 P.2d 808 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
Voland v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona 943 P.2d 808 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
Co., , citing Taylor v. State Farm Mut.