Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Brown v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 977 P.2d 807.

203 citing documents.

Gersten v. Gersten 219 P.3d 309 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Co., ¶¶ 30-34 , (noting error not cause for reversal absent showing of harm).
Jones v. Weston 212 P.3d 835 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
Jones v. Weston 212 P.3d 835 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
Bogard v. CANNON & WENDT ELEC. CO., INC. 212 P.3d 17 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Bogard v. CANNON & WENDT ELEC. CO., INC. 212 P.3d 17 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Co., ¶ 7 , (citation omitted).
Fia Card Services v. Douglas B. Levy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Fia Card Services v. Douglas B. Levy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Co., (appellate court does not consider contentions unsupported by authority).
Hetherington v. Hetherington 202 P.3d 481 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Hetherington v. Hetherington 202 P.3d 481 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Manuel M. v. Ades, Leila M., Alayena M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Manuel M. v. Ades, Leila M., Alayena M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Christy A. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 173 P.3d 463 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Christy A. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 173 P.3d 463 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
In Re Jesse M. 170 P.3d 683 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
In Re Jesse M. 170 P.3d 683 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Co., ¶ 33 , 977 P.2d *82 807, 813 (App.1998), a judge does not have the discretion to disregard the statutory requirement for a verbatim record.
Dawson v. Withycombe 163 P.3d 1034 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Dawson v. Withycombe 163 P.3d 1034 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Dawson v. Withycombe 160 P.3d 1157 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Dawson v. Withycombe 160 P.3d 1157 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Williams v. Baugh 154 P.3d 373 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Williams v. Baugh Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Williams v. Baugh Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Co., (declining to address contention made without supporting authority or argument).
Williams v. Baugh 154 P.3d 373 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Co., , (declining to address contention made without supporting authority or argument).
Acuna v. Hampton And Kroack Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Acuna v. Hampton And Kroack Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
§ 12-2103(A), an appellate court Ariz. 85, ¶ 50, (rejecting assertion that “is wholly without supporting argument or citation of authority”).
State Ex Rel. Mendez v. AMERICAN SUPPORT 100 P.3d 932 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
State Ex Rel. Mendez v. AMERICAN SUPPORT 100 P.3d 932 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Associated Aviation Underwriters v. Wood 98 P.3d 572 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Associated Aviation Underwriters v. Wood 98 P.3d 572 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Ry-Tan Construction, Inc. v. Washington Elementary School District No. 6 93 P.3d 1095 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Ry-Tan Construction, Inc. v. Washington Elementary School District No. 6 93 P.3d 1095 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Nangle v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona 73 P.3d 1252 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Nangle v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona 73 P.3d 1252 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Co., , and determined that the policy exclusion specifically precluded recovery by Nancy as an innocent coinsured.
American Family Mutual Insurance v. White 65 P.3d 449 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
American Family Mutual Insurance v. White 65 P.3d 449 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Co., ¶ 61 , (citations omitted).
Zimmerman v. Shakman 62 P.3d 976 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Zimmerman v. Shakman 62 P.3d 976 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Swanson v. Image Bank, Inc. 43 P.3d 174 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
Swanson v. Image Bank, Inc. 43 P.3d 174 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
In re 1996 Nissan Sentra 32 P.3d 39 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
In re 1996 Nissan Sentra 32 P.3d 39 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
Co., , (rejecting assertion of bad faith against insurer not supported by argument or citation of authority).
S Development Co. v. Pima Capital Management Co. 31 P.3d 123 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
S Development Co. v. Pima Capital Management Co. 31 P.3d 123 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
City of Tucson v. Grezaffi 23 P.3d 675 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
City of Tucson v. Grezaffi 23 P.3d 675 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
Carrasco v. State 19 P.3d 635 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
Carrasco v. State 19 P.3d 635 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
Co., , (arguments not supported by authority rejected).
In re United States Currency In Amount of $26,980.00 18 P.3d 85 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
In re United States Currency In Amount of $26,980.00 18 P.3d 85 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
City of Phoenix v. Wilson 4 P.3d 999 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by