Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite In Re Miguel R., 63 P.3d 1065.
- State of Arizona v. Evan McCarrick Jerald 548 P.3d 1110 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
- State of Arizona v. Evan McCarrick Jerald 548 P.3d 1110 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
- In Re Adan R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
- In Re Adan R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
- In Re Ruben P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- In Re Ruben P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- In Re Priscila O. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
In Re Priscila O.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
§ 8-341; ¶ 9 (App. 2003).
- Meyer v. Petroff Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Meyer v. Petroff Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- In Re Augustine M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
In Re Augustine M.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
§ 8-341; ¶ 9 (App. 2003).
- In Re Jelohera J. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
In Re Jelohera J.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 4 (App. 2003) ( ¶ 7 (App. 1999)).
- In Re Justice M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
In Re Justice M.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
§ 8-341.01(A) (disposition order for participation in residential treatment program must be supported by psychological evaluation); ¶ 4, (rehabilitation is the purpose of disposition after adjudication of delinquency); ¶ 21, (where not explicitly stated, we presume juvenile court implicitly made findings necessary to justify disposition order).
- In re Thomas D. 290 P.3d 223 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
- In re Thomas D. 290 P.3d 223 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
- In Re Martin M. and Rene N. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
- In Re Martin M. 221 P.3d 1058 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
-
In Re Martin M. and Rene N.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
(juvenile disposition hearing analogous to adult sentencing).
-
In Re Martin M.
221 P.3d 1058
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
(juvenile disposition hearing analogous to adult sentencing).
- In Re Hillary C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
-
In Re Hillary C.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
¶¶ 35-36, -75 (App. 2003) (noting rehabilitative purpose of juvenile disposition).
- In Re Stephanie N. 110 P.3d 1280 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
-
In Re Stephanie N.
110 P.3d 1280
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
¶ 35 , (stating that the "juvenile delinquency proceedings differ from adult criminal prosecutions because the state’s role as parens patriae is to act in the best interests of the juvenile”).