Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Lessner Dental Laboratories, Inc. v. Kidney, 492 P.2d 39.

26 citing documents.

Sadeghi v. Majaly Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Sadeghi v. Majaly Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
See Lessner Dental Lab’ys, (“[A] promise for a promise is adequate consideration.”) (citation omitted).
Sullivan v. Homes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Sullivan v. Homes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
“It is also a general rule that a promise for a promise is adequate consideration.” Lessner Dental Labs., see also K-Line Builders, 139 Ariz. at 212, 677 P.2d at 1320 (“Consideration is a benefit to the promisor or a loss or detriment to the promisee .
Best Choice Fund, LLC v. Low & Childers, P.C. 269 P.3d 678 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Best Choice Fund, LLC v. Low & Childers, P.C. 269 P.3d 678 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Fearnow v. Ridenour, Swenson, Cleere & Evans, P.C. 138 P.3d 723 Ariz. 2006
Fearnow v. Ridenour, Swenson, Cleere & Evans, P.C. 138 P.3d 723 Ariz. 2006
Bryceland v. Northey 772 P.2d 36 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Bryceland v. Northey 772 P.2d 36 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
See Lessner Dental Laboratories
Alpha Tax Services, Inc. v. Stuart 761 P.2d 1073 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Alpha Tax Services, Inc. v. Stuart 761 P.2d 1073 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
See Lessner Dental Laboratories
Mattison v. Johnston 730 P.2d 286 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Mattison v. Johnston 730 P.2d 286 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Lessner Dental Laboratories
Amex Distributing Co., Inc. v. Mascari 724 P.2d 596 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Amex Distributing Co., Inc. v. Mascari 724 P.2d 596 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
145, 147 , and cases cited; cf. Lessner Dental Laboratories
Olliver/Pilcher Ins., Inc. v. Daniels 715 P.2d 1218 Ariz. 1986
Olliver/Pilcher Ins., Inc. v. Daniels 715 P.2d 1218 Ariz. 1986
See Lessner Dental Laboratories, , (preventing dental prosthetic technician from practicing trade for two years was overly broad and therefore unenforceable).
Olliver/Pilcher Ins., Inc. v. Daniels 715 P.2d 1222 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Olliver/Pilcher Ins., Inc. v. Daniels 715 P.2d 1222 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Lessner Dental Lab, 161 , -41 (1971).
K-Line Builders v. First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n 677 P.2d 1317 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
K-Line Builders v. First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n 677 P.2d 1317 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Tucson Federal Savings & , Lessner Dental Laboratories
Truly Nolen Exterminating, Inc. v. Blackwell 610 P.2d 483 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
Truly Nolen Exterminating, Inc. v. Blackwell 610 P.2d 483 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
As we stated in Lessner Dental Laboratories, , : “The test of validity of restrictive covenants is one of reasonableness.
Arizona Chuck Wagon Service, Inc. v. Barenburg 496 P.2d 878 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Arizona Chuck Wagon Service, Inc. v. Barenburg 496 P.2d 878 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Restrictive covenants generally were well analyzed in Lessner Dental Laboratories

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by