Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Beeck v. Tucson General Hospital, 500 P.2d 1153.

25 citing documents.

Starr v. Banner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
Hosp., (a hospital may be vicariously liable for a physician who is its actual agent); Fadely v. Encompass Health Valley of Sun Rehab.
Schnurr v. Banner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Schnurr v. Banner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Hosp., –71 (1972); 2 Arizona case law has blended the concepts of employer-employee relationships and actual agency relationships in the physician-hospital context.
Fadely v. Encompass Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Fadely v. Encompass Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Hosp., (“[W]e hold that an employee-employer relationship existed between [the physician] and the hospital.”), and Barrett v. Samaritan Health Servs.
Midtown Medical Group, Inc. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 206 P.3d 790 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Midtown Medical Group, Inc. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 206 P.3d 790 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
¶ 24 Although ease law is sparse on this issue, , held that a doctor could be an employee of a hospital and that the hospital was therefore subject to respondeat superior liability.
Henry v. Flagstaff Medical Center, Inc. 132 P.3d 304 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Henry v. Flagstaff Medical Center, Inc. 132 P.3d 304 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
¶ 14 FMC makes passing references to Barrett v. Samaritan Health Services, Inc., , P.2d 1153 (1972), both of which cases involved similar issues.
Barrett v. Samaritan Health Services, Inc. 735 P.2d 460 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Barrett v. Samaritan Health Services, Inc. 735 P.2d 460 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
In our opinion, , is dispositive.
Gregg v. National Medical Health Care Services, Inc. 699 P.2d 925 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Gregg v. National Medical Health Care Services, Inc. 699 P.2d 925 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Carranza v. Tucson Medical Center 662 P.2d 455 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Carranza v. Tucson Medical Center 662 P.2d 455 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Fridena v. Evans 622 P.2d 463 Ariz. 1980
Fridena v. Evans 622 P.2d 463 Ariz. 1980
Holmes v. Hoemako Hospital 573 P.2d 491 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
Holmes v. Hoemako Hospital 573 P.2d 491 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
The record also contained appellant’s uncontroverted affidavit that he has exercised his staff privileges as an independent contractor, and that the hospital in all his years of practice has recognized the independent nature of the staff physician
Peterson v. Tucson General Hospital, Inc. 559 P.2d 186 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
Peterson v. Tucson General Hospital, Inc. 559 P.2d 186 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
Tucson Medical Center, Incorporated v. Misevch 545 P.2d 958 Ariz. 1976
Tucson Medical Center, Incorporated v. Misevch 545 P.2d 958 Ariz. 1976
Evans v. Bernhard 533 P.2d 721 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Evans v. Bernhard 533 P.2d 721 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975