Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Blecick v. School District No. 18 of Cochise County, 406 P.2d 750.

38 citing documents.

Ramsey v. Arizona Registrar of Contractors 384 P.3d 316 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Ramsey v. Arizona Registrar of Contractors 384 P.3d 316 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
No. 18 of Cochise Cty., -23 (1965), overruled on other grounds by Donnelly Constr.
Stonecreek Bldg. Co., Inc. v. Shure 162 P.3d 675 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Stonecreek Bldg. Co., Inc. v. Shure 162 P.3d 675 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
No. 18, , overruled in part on other grounds by Donnelly Constr.
Standard Chartered PLC v. Price Waterhouse 945 P.2d 317 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Standard Chartered PLC v. Price Waterhouse 945 P.2d 317 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
In the course of its opinion, the supreme court expressly overruled Blecick v. School District No. 18, , which had imposed a privity requirement for contractors’ suits against architects.
Dixon v. City of Phoenix 845 P.2d 1107 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Dixon v. City of Phoenix 845 P.2d 1107 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
See, e.g., County of Maricopa v. Walsh & Oberg Architects, Inc., , Blecick v. School District No. 18 of Cochise County, , rev’d on other grounds
Murdock-Bryant Construction, Inc. v. Pearson 703 P.2d 1206 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Murdock-Bryant Construction, Inc. v. Pearson 703 P.2d 1206 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Appellants rely upon Blecick v. School District No. 18 of Cochise County, , and Sorenson v. Robert N. Ewing, General Contractor, 8 Ariz.App.
Donnelly Construction Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/Gilleland 677 P.2d 1292 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Donnelly Const. Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/Gilleland 677 P.2d 1292 Ariz. 1984
Donnelly Construction Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/Gilleland 677 P.2d 1292 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
This argument was premised on Blecick v. School District No. 18 of Cochise County
Donnelly Const. Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/Gilleland 677 P.2d 1292 Ariz. 1984
This argument was premised on Blecick v. School District No. 18 of Cochise County
Donnelly Const. Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/Gilleland 677 P.2d 1298 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Donnelly Const. Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/Gilleland 677 P.2d 1298 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
The Architects argue that the issue of whether a contractor has a cause of action against an architect, in absence of contractual privity, has been decided in Arizona in the case of Blecick v. School District No. 18 of Cochise County
Donnelly Construction Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/Gilleland 677 P.2d 1298 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Donnelly Construction Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/Gilleland 677 P.2d 1298 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
The Architects argue that the issue of whether a contractor has a cause of action against an architect, in absence of contractual privity, has been decided in Arizona in the case of Blecick v. School District No. 18 of Cochise County
Fairway Builders, Inc. v. Malouf Towers Rental Co. 603 P.2d 513 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Fairway Builders, Inc. v. Malouf Towers Rental Co. 603 P.2d 513 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Citing County of Maricopa v. Walsh & Oberg Architects, Inc., , and Blecick v. School District No. 18 of Cochise County, , Fairway alleges that the cost of repair will result in economic waste since there was no need to entirely remove the exterior walls.
County of Maricopa v. Walsh & Oberg Architects, Inc. 494 P.2d 44 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
County of Maricopa v. Walsh & Oberg Architects, Inc. 494 P.2d 44 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Blecick v. School District No. 18 of Cochise County
Reber Ex Rel. Industrial Commission v. Chandler High School District 202 474 P.2d 852 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Reber Ex Rel. Industrial Commission v. Chandler High School District 202 474 P.2d 852 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
First, the defendant architect, citing Blecick v. School District No. 18 of Cochise County, , contends that the extent of his duties must be' determined solely from the provisions of his contract with the owner, and that since he was not a party to the contract between the owner and the general contractor, the provisions of that contract relating to the architect’s supervision duties hav
Ghyselinck v. Buchanan 474 P.2d 844 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Ghyselinck v. Buchanan 474 P.2d 844 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
No. 18 of Cochise County, , even though the defendant himself has made statements contradicting his own testimony.
Economy v. Frohme 474 P.2d 836 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
Economy v. Frohme 474 P.2d 836 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
Blecick Const. v. School District #18 of Cochise County
McClennen v. McClennen 464 P.2d 982 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
McClennen v. McClennen 464 P.2d 982 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Blecick v. School District No. 18 of Cochise County
Town & Country Chrysler Plymouth v. Porter 464 P.2d 815 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Town & Country Chrysler Plymouth v. Porter 464 P.2d 815 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Blecick v. School District No. 18 of Cochise County
Sorensen v. Robert N. Ewing, General Contractor 448 P.2d 110 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Sorensen v. Robert N. Ewing, General Contractor 448 P.2d 110 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Blecick v. School District No. 18 of Cochise County, , Haviland v. Dawson, 210 A.2d 551 (D.C.App.1965); Autrey v. Williams and Dunlap, 343 F.2d 730 (5th Cir. 1965); Jones v. Elliott, 172 Neb.
Kalmanoff v. Weitz 444 P.2d 728 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
Kalmanoff v. Weitz 444 P.2d 728 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
Blecick v. School District No. 18 of Cochise County, , Pulos v. Little, 4 Ariz.App.
Industrial Commission v. Superior Court in and for County of Pima 423 P.2d 375 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Industrial Commission v. Superior Court in and for County of Pima 423 P.2d 375 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Blecick v. School District No. 18 of Cochise County