Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Vivian Arnold Realty Co. v. McCormick, 506 P.2d 1074.

34 citing documents.

White v. Greater Arizona Bicycling Association 163 P.3d 1083 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
White v. Greater Arizona Bicycling Association 163 P.3d 1083 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Cf. Quinonez, 144 Ariz. at 196 , 696 P.2d at 1345 (wrongful death action has one plaintiff and one judgment; damages are then apportioned to statutoiy beneficiaries); , (because “damages are an element of a cause of action for negligence, nominal damages cannot be awarded where there is a failure to prove those damages”).
Lombardo v. Albu 4 P.3d 395 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Lombardo v. Albu 4 P.3d 395 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
(stating that a “real estate agent owes a duty of utmost good faith and loyalty to the principal____”).
Reed v. Mitchell & Timbanard, P.C. 903 P.2d 621 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Reed v. Mitchell & Timbanard, P.C. 903 P.2d 621 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Haldiman v. Gosnell Development Corp. 748 P.2d 1209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Haldiman v. Gosnell Development Corp. 748 P.2d 1209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Musselman v. Southwinds Realty, Inc. 704 P.2d 814 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Musselman v. Southwinds Realty, Inc. 704 P.2d 814 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
and the facts of that case did not concern the price obtained by the agent but instead whether the agent breached a duty to inform the vendor that the buyer stood ready to close.
Hardine v. Pioneer National Title Insurance 699 P.2d 1314 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Hardine v. Pioneer National Title Insurance 699 P.2d 1314 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Since damages are an essential element of a cause of action in negligence, , the trial court properly found that appellant did not establish her negligence claim.
Esplendido Apartments v. Olsson 697 P.2d 1105 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Esplendido Apartments v. Olsson 697 P.2d 1105 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
buyers next argue that the trial court erred in denying their claim for return of the earnest money since seller never actually deposited the deed and assignment of lease in escrow.
Justus v. Clelland 651 P.2d 1206 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
Justus v. Clelland 651 P.2d 1206 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
Dalton v. McLaughlin 635 P.2d 863 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Dalton v. McLaughlin 635 P.2d 863 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Tester v. Tester 597 P.2d 194 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
Tester v. Tester 597 P.2d 194 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
Marmis v. Solot Co. 573 P.2d 899 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
Marmis v. Solot Co. 573 P.2d 899 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
Ness v. Greater Arizona Realty, Inc. 572 P.2d 1195 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
Ness v. Greater Arizona Realty, Inc. 572 P.2d 1195 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
Bennett v. Estate of Baker 557 P.2d 195 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
Bennett v. Estate of Baker 557 P.2d 195 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
Morley v. J. Pagel Realty & Insurance 550 P.2d 1104 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
Morley v. J. Pagel Realty & Insurance 550 P.2d 1104 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
We recently discussed the duties of a seller’s real estate broker in Vivian Arnold *64 , : “A real estate agent owes a duty of utmost good faith and loyalty to the principal, and one employed to sell property has the specific duty of exercising reasonable due care and diligence to effect a sale to the best advantage of the principal — that is, on the best terms and at the best price
Norville v. Palant 545 P.2d 454 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
Norville v. Palant 545 P.2d 454 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
We recently discussed the fiduciary obligations of a
Warren v. Mangels Realty 533 P.2d 78 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
Warren v. Mangels Realty 533 P.2d 78 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
Herderick v. State 530 P.2d 1144 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Herderick v. State 530 P.2d 1144 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975