Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Bourne v. Lord, 506 P.2d 268.
- Burger v. Waldren Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
-
Burger v. Waldren
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
see also Drahos, 149 Ariz. at 249-50 (recognizing the community’s right to an equitable lien against separate property when community funds are used to pay the mortgage on the separate property).
- Lattin v. Shamrock Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
- Lattin v. Shamrock Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
- Stewart v. Stewart Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
-
Stewart v. Stewart
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
(holding that because wife’s name on deed to trailer purchased with husband’s separate property was inserted neither at husband’s direction nor with his knowledge, the form of the deed did not alter the trailer’s separate-property status and was in any event merely prima facie evidence of ownership).
- Chauncey v. Chauncey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Chauncey v. Chauncey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Baldwin v. Baldwin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- Baldwin v. Baldwin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- American Express Travel Related Services Co. v. Parmeter 925 P.2d 1369 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
-
American Express Travel Related Services Co. v. Parmeter
925 P.2d 1369
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
Hrudka, 919 P.2d at 186-87
- In Re the Estate of Calligaro v. Owen 768 P.2d 660 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
- In Re the Estate of Calligaro v. Owen 768 P.2d 660 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
- Martin v. Martin 752 P.2d 1026 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
- Martin v. Martin 752 P.2d 1026 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
- Nationwide Resources Corp. v. Massabni 694 P.2d 290 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
- Nationwide Resources Corp. v. Massabni 694 P.2d 290 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
- Rubenstein v. Sela 672 P.2d 492 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
-
Rubenstein v. Sela
672 P.2d 492
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
While the recitals in a deed do not preclude a court from looking behind the deed to determine true ownership, , here, Lynn not only signed the deed, but also signed the agreement clearly stating her intent to transfer her interest in the property to Amit.
- Cooper v. Cooper 635 P.2d 850 Ariz. 1981
-
Cooper v. Cooper
635 P.2d 850
Ariz. 1981
We must also consider that “[wjhere community property and separate property are commingled, the entire fund is presumed to be community property unless the separate property can be explicitly traced.” , 195 P. 132 , 137 (1948)
- Neely v. Neely 563 P.2d 302 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
-
Neely v. Neely
563 P.2d 302
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
this court held that recitals in a deed are merely prima facie evidence of ownership and did not preclude the trial court from determining the true status of the property.
- Everson v. Everson 537 P.2d 624 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
- Everson v. Everson 537 P.2d 624 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
- Burton v. Burton 531 P.2d 204 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
- Burton v. Burton 531 P.2d 204 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
- Myrland v. Myrland 508 P.2d 757 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
- Myrland v. Myrland 508 P.2d 757 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973