Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Vanguard Insurance Company v. Cantrell, 503 P.2d 962.
- Republic Insurance v. Feidler 969 P.2d 173 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
-
Republic Insurance v. Feidler
969 P.2d 173
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
(insurer had burden of showing loss was within policy exclusion; having failed to show that insured intended the injury to the victim, it failed to meet its burden).
- Ohio Casualty Insurance v. Henderson 939 P.2d 1337 Ariz. 1997
-
Ohio Casualty Insurance v. Henderson
939 P.2d 1337
Ariz. 1997
supports a contrary proposition, we disapprove it.
- Ohio Casualty Insurance v. Henderson 927 P.2d 815 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
- Ohio Casualty Insurance v. Henderson 927 P.2d 815 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
- Ruiz v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona 865 P.2d 762 Ariz. 1993
- Ruiz v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona 865 P.2d 762 Ariz. 1993
- Ruiz v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona 847 P.2d 111 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
-
Ruiz v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona
847 P.2d 111
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
n several occasions have considered the general issue of when an injury arises out of the ownership, maintenance or use of a vehicle: , , , , Brenner v. Aetna Insurance Co., 8 Ariz.App.
- Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona v. Till 825 P.2d 954 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
- Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona v. Till 825 P.2d 954 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
- St. Paul Property & Liability Insurance v. Eymann 802 P.2d 1043 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
-
St. Paul Property & Liability Insurance v. Eymann
802 P.2d 1043
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
the insured robbed a drive-in liquor store while armed with a gun.
- Phoenix Control System, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North America 796 P.2d 463 Ariz. 1990
- Phoenix Control System, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North America 796 P.2d 463 Ariz. 1990
- Scottsdale Insurance v. Van Nguyen 763 P.2d 540 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
- American Modern Home Insurance v. Rocha 729 P.2d 949 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
-
American Modern Home Insurance v. Rocha
729 P.2d 949
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Brenner v. Aetna Insurance Company, 8 Ariz.App.
- ASH, Inc. v. Mesa Unified School District No. 4 673 P.2d 934 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
-
ASH, Inc. v. Mesa Unified School District No. 4
673 P.2d 934
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
See Peter Kiewit Sons’ , (interpreting workmen’s compensation statute); , (interpreting insurance contract clause).
- Fire Insurance Exchange v. Berray 694 P.2d 259 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
- Fire Insurance Exchange v. Berray 694 P.2d 259 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
- Transport Indemnity Co. v. Carolina Casualty Insurance 652 P.2d 134 Ariz. 1982
-
Transport Indemnity Co. v. Carolina Casualty Insurance
652 P.2d 134
Ariz. 1982
National Farmers Union Property and Casualty Co. v. Western Casualty & Surety Co.
- Parkinson v. Farmers Insurance 594 P.2d 1039 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
-
Parkinson v. Farmers Insurance
594 P.2d 1039
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
Although the exclusion is inapplicable when the perpetrator acts without any intent or expectation of causing injury, , it is applicable when he acts with an intent to cause injury but the actual injury differs from the one intended or expected.
- Steinmetz v. National American Insurance 589 P.2d 911 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
- Steinmetz v. National American Insurance 589 P.2d 911 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
- Love v. Farmers Insurance Group 588 P.2d 364 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
-
Love v. Farmers Insurance Group
588 P.2d 364
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
Exchange, , Morari, supra; , Brenner v. Aetna Ins.
- Lockhart v. Allstate Insurance 579 P.2d 1120 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
-
Lockhart v. Allstate Insurance
579 P.2d 1120
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
we held that an “intentional injury” exclusion clause, such as we have here, does not relieve the insurer from liability merely because its insured intentionally fired a pistol.
- Continental Western Insurance v. Toal 244 N.W.2d 121 Minn. 1976
- Clark v. Allstate Insurance Company 529 P.2d 1195 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
- Clark v. Allstate Insurance Company 529 P.2d 1195 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
- Arizona Title Insurance & Trust Company v. Smith 519 P.2d 860 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1974
-
Arizona Title Insurance & Trust Company v. Smith
519 P.2d 860
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1974
United American Life Insurance Company v. Beadel, 13 Ariz.App.