Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Hanrahan v. Sims, 512 P.2d 617.
- Hani W Saba v. Sawsan Khoury 516 P.3d 891 Ariz. 2022
- Hani W Saba v. Sawsan Khoury 516 P.3d 891 Ariz. 2022
- Femiano v. Maust 463 P.3d 237 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Femiano v. Maust
463 P.3d 237
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
See Lawson, 72 Ariz. at 261; ¶ 15 (App. 2009).
- Hefner v. Hefner 456 P.3d 20 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
-
Hefner v. Hefner
456 P.3d 20
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
See Valento, 225 Ariz. at 481 (“When the community contributes capital to separate property, it acquires an equitable lien against that property.”); 4 (“The remedy of the possessor of an equitable lien is to come into a court of equity and have his lien recognized, declared, and if necessary, enforced.”).
- Valento v. Valento 240 P.3d 1239 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
-
Valento v. Valento
240 P.3d 1239
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
4 -18 , -22 (1973); Barnett, 219 Ariz. at 554, ¶ 15 , 200 P.3d at 1051 .
- Marriage of Barnett v. Jedynak 200 P.3d 1047 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
- Marriage of Barnett v. Jedynak 200 P.3d 1047 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
- Pima County v. Pima County Law Enforcement Merit System Council 99 P.3d 19 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
-
Pima County v. Pima County Law Enforcement Merit System Council
99 P.3d 19
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
(“As a general rule, we will not review an issue on appeal that was not argued or factually established in the trial court.”); , (“[R]es judicata is an affirmative defense and must be pleaded and proved.
- Van Emmerik v. Colosi 972 P.2d 1034 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
-
Van Emmerik v. Colosi
972 P.2d 1034
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
(community “dissolved by the husband’s death”).
- Cameron v. Cameron 715 P.2d 1246 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
- Cameron v. Cameron 715 P.2d 1246 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
- Drahos v. Rens 717 P.2d 927 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
- Drahos v. Rens 717 P.2d 927 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
- Matter of Estate of Levine 700 P.2d 883 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
-
Matter of Estate of Levine
700 P.2d 883
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
(claimant contended property was partnership property under a partnership agreement with decedent); , (contention was that property was not estate asset to the extent of claimant’s half of the community); Lecky v. Staley, 6 Ariz.App.
- In Re Marriage of Berger 680 P.2d 1217 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
-
In Re Marriage of Berger
680 P.2d 1217
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
W. Reppy & W. De Funiak, Community Property in the United States, 244-45 (1975).
- Honnas v. Honnas 648 P.2d 1045 Ariz. 1982
-
Honnas v. Honnas
648 P.2d 1045
Ariz. 1982
W. Reppy & W. De Funiak, Community Property in the United States, 244—45 (1975).
- Nienstedt v. Wetzel 651 P.2d 876 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
-
Nienstedt v. Wetzel
651 P.2d 876
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
see also Abner v. Arizona Newspapers, Inc., 11 Ariz.App.
- Wisner v. Wisner 631 P.2d 115 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
- Wisner v. Wisner 631 P.2d 115 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
- Backman v. Backman 621 P.2d 920 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
- Backman v. Backman 621 P.2d 920 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
- Tester v. Tester 597 P.2d 194 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
-
Tester v. Tester
597 P.2d 194
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
and equitable principles dictate that benefits received by the community should be considered in determining the amount of reimbursement.”
- Cotton v. Industrial Commission 546 P.2d 35 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
- Cotton v. Industrial Commission 546 P.2d 35 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976