Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Anderson v. Muniz, 515 P.2d 52.

30 citing documents.

Catherine E. Warner v. Southwest Desert Images, LLC Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Catherine E. Warner v. Southwest Desert Images, LLC Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
¶35 We find no support in Arizona law for Warner’s position that the collateral source rule “has been abolished with respect to work[ers’] compensation benefit payments and liens.” -29, -56 (1973), but that case did not analyze the collateral source rule; it held that a plaintiff’s damages for medical expenses are calculated according to the rates actually charged by his doctor, not the higher rates the doctor would have charged absent a contract with the insurer.
Lopez v. Safeway Stores, Inc. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Lopez v. Safeway Stores, Inc. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
DISCUSSION I ¶4 Safeway argues “[t]he trial court’s pretrial ruling on [Safeway’s] Motion in Limine and the subsequent submission of full medical bills constitute reversible error requiring a retrial.” P.2d 52 (1973), Safeway maintains a “plaintiff’s recovery for medical expense claims should be limited to contractually agreed rates accepted in full satisfaction for medical care, not the face amount of billings.” Therefore, Safeway asserts, the trial court erred in admitting “evidence at trial o
ChartOne, Inc. v. Bernini 83 P.3d 1103 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Chartone, Inc. v. Mercaldo, Ltd. Webb, Pc. Durazzo & Eckel Smart Professional Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
ChartOne, Inc. v. Bernini 83 P.3d 1103 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Chartone, Inc. v. Mercaldo, Ltd. Webb, Pc. Durazzo & Eckel Smart Professional Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Ogden v. J.M. Steel Erecting, Inc. 31 P.3d 806 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Ogden v. J.M. Steel Erecting, Inc. 31 P.3d 806 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
In Styles , this Court determined that a “retrial should be granted on both liability and damages ‘when the issues are interwoven and cannot be separated without injustice to the opposing party.’ ” 185 Ariz. at 451-52 , 916 P.2d at 1167 -68 ( , ).
Englert v. Carondelet Health Network 13 P.3d 763 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
Englert v. Carondelet Health Network 13 P.3d 763 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
-80 , -39 (1983); Styles, 185 Ariz. at 451 , 916 P.2d at 1167
Larsen v. Decker 995 P.2d 281 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Larsen v. Decker 995 P.2d 281 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Styles v. Ceranski 916 P.2d 1164 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Styles v. Ceranski 916 P.2d 1164 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
The retrial should be granted on both liability and damages “when the issues are interwoven and cannot be separated without injustice to the opposing party.” , 515 * -80 , -39 (1983).
Lewin v. Miller Wagner & Co., Ltd. 725 P.2d 736 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Lewin v. Miller Wagner & Co., Ltd. 725 P.2d 736 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Begay v. City of Tucson 715 P.2d 758 Ariz. 1986
Begay v. City of Tucson 715 P.2d 758 Ariz. 1986
Bustamante v. City of Tucson 701 P.2d 861 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Bustamante v. City of Tucson 701 P.2d 861 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Readenour v. Marion Power Shovel 719 P.2d 1070 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Readenour v. Marion Power Shovel 719 P.2d 1070 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Crawford v. SUPERIOR COURT IN & FOR PIMA CTY. 698 P.2d 743 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
Crawford v. SUPERIOR COURT IN & FOR PIMA CTY. 698 P.2d 743 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
Hernandez v. State 623 P.2d 819 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
Hernandez v. State 623 P.2d 819 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
Burgy v. Hubbard 581 P.2d 260 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
Burgy v. Hubbard 581 P.2d 260 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
in which there was no dispute that the medical expenses were related to the accident.