Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Goff v. Superior Courts in and for Counties of Pima and Maricopa, 409 P.2d 60.

34 citing documents.

King v. Bertram Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
King v. Bertram Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
See Goff v. Superior Courts (Robinson), (a ruling on venue may be corrected by a special action “if an abuse of discretion is shown”); (“[S]pecial action is an appropriate procedure for raising challenges to venue rulings.”).
Gabris v. Gabris Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Gabris v. Gabris Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
4 GABRIS v. GABRIS Decision of the Court Courts In & For Pima & Maricopa Ctys., see A.R.S.
Salerno v. Espinoza 115 P.3d 626 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Salerno v. Espinoza 115 P.3d 626 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
See also Goff v. Superior Courts (Robinson), , (“[T]here is ...
In Re the Marriage of Dorman 9 P.3d 329 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
In Re the Marriage of Dorman 9 P.3d 329 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
Vasko, , (denial of *303 dismissal for violation of speedy trial rights must be challenged by special action if violation purely technical and nonprejudicial); , (order modifying rate of restitution must be challenged by special action); Goff v. Pima & Maricopa County Superior Courts, , (denial of change of venue should be challenged by special action); -72 , -40 (1986) (special action more appropriate than appeal to challenge denial of motion to intervene in dependency action); Finch v. Sup
Maricopa County v. Barkley 812 P.2d 1052 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Maricopa County v. Barkley 812 P.2d 1052 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Ariz. Const. art. 6, § 27.”
Apache County v. Superior Court 785 P.2d 1242 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Apache County v. Superior Court 785 P.2d 1242 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
City of St. Johns v. Superior Court 746 P.2d 941 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
City of St. Johns v. Superior Court 746 P.2d 941 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Grigg v. Superior Court 669 P.2d 1347 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Grigg v. Superior Court 669 P.2d 1347 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Galaz v. Vinyard 627 P.2d 1104 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Galaz v. Vinyard 627 P.2d 1104 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Schoenberger v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, ETC. 606 P.2d 18 Ariz. 1980
Schoenberger v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, ETC. 606 P.2d 18 Ariz. 1980
McKinney v. Superior Court 509 P.2d 638 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
McKinney v. Superior Court 509 P.2d 638 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Sherrill v. SUPERIOR COURT IN & FOR COUNTY OF PIMA 493 P.2d 1230 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
Sherrill v. SUPERIOR COURT IN & FOR COUNTY OF PIMA 493 P.2d 1230 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
Since appellate intervention by way of special action is appropriate, , we assume jurisdiction.
GAC Properties, Inc. of Arizona v. Farley 481 P.2d 526 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
GAC Properties, Inc. of Arizona v. Farley 481 P.2d 526 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
Smitherman v. Superior Court 424 P.2d 461 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Smitherman v. Superior Court 424 P.2d 461 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Williams v. Garrett 417 P.2d 378 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Williams v. Garrett 417 P.2d 378 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Turner v. SUPERIOR COURT, IN AND FOR COUNTY FOR PIMA 415 P.2d 129 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Turner v. SUPERIOR COURT, IN AND FOR COUNTY FOR PIMA 415 P.2d 129 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Brown v. Superior Court 409 P.2d 593 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Brown v. Superior Court 409 P.2d 593 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
filed December 22, 1965.