Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Herzog v. Reinhardt, 406 P.2d 738.

28 citing documents.

Chambers v. Fox Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Chambers v. Fox Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Because we lack appellate jurisdiction to review Father’s objections to the court’s decision, n.2, ¶ 9 (App. 2009), that portion of the appeal is dismissed, 5 C. Attorney Fees ¶8 Father argues the family court erred in denying his request for attorney fees, urging that Mother’s position throughout the proceedings was unreasonable.
Petrocelli v. Anderson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Petrocelli v. Anderson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Green v. Lisa Frank, Inc. 211 P.3d 16 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
Green v. Lisa Frank, Inc. 211 P.3d 16 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
512, 512-13 , -72 (1973) (civil contempt order fining attorney for failing to appear in criminal action not appealable); (same); -05, -40 (1965) (no appeal from contempt order enforcing child custody order).
Elia v. Pifer 977 P.2d 796 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Elia v. Pifer 977 P.2d 796 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
170, 171, -05 , -40 (1965).
Berry v. Superior Court 788 P.2d 1258 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Berry v. Superior Court 788 P.2d 1258 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Grigg v. Superior Court 669 P.2d 1347 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Grigg v. Superior Court 669 P.2d 1347 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Pace v. Pace 626 P.2d 619 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Pace v. Pace 626 P.2d 619 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
State v. Mulligan 613 P.2d 1266 Ariz. 1980
State v. Mulligan 613 P.2d 1266 Ariz. 1980
527 , or, if imprisoned, habeas corpus
Richards v. Superior Court 523 P.2d 117 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Richards v. Superior Court 523 P.2d 117 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
As such an order is not appealable, , and the relief sought is based on a claim that the trial court exceeded its jurisdiction or abused its discretion, review by special action is appropriate.
United Farm Workers National Union v. Heggblade - Marguleas - Tenneco, Inc. 520 P.2d 1191 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
United Farm Workers National Union v. Heggblade - Marguleas - Tenneco, Inc. 520 P.2d 1191 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Van Baalen v. Superior Court 508 P.2d 771 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Van Baalen v. Superior Court 508 P.2d 771 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
25 , ; Anonymous v. Superior Court, supra; , ; Rogers v. Superior Court, 2 Ariz.App.
Weiss v. Superior Court of Pima County 472 P.2d 950 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
Weiss v. Superior Court of Pima County 472 P.2d 950 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
/s/ Robert O. Roylston, Judge” Since there is no appeal under the circumstances, , we deem appellate intervention by special action appropriate and assume jurisdiction.
Johnson v. Johnson 455 P.2d 463 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Johnson v. Johnson 455 P.2d 463 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
this court held that under Arizona law, in an appeal from an order modifying a divorce decree and holding a party in contempt, the order covering the contempt was not an appeal-able order and that only that part of the decree going to modification, to wit, distributing certain personalty, was ap
Anonymous v. Superior Court 418 P.2d 416 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Anonymous v. Superior Court 418 P.2d 416 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
211 P. 576 (1922) ; , 281 P. 944 (1929) ; A.R.S.