Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Clark v. Allstate Insurance Company, 529 P.2d 1195.

34 citing documents.

Republic Insurance v. Feidler 969 P.2d 173 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Republic Insurance v. Feidler 969 P.2d 173 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Western Agricultural Insurance v. Brown 985 P.2d 530 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Western Agricultural Insurance v. Brown 985 P.2d 530 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
held that "if the injury results from the natural and probable consequences of the intentional act, the subjective intent of the actor is simply immaterial — the exclusion applies.” , held that "the act of striking another in the face is one which we recognize as an act so certain to cause a particular kind of harm that we can say a person who performed the act intended the resulting harm, and his statement to the contrary does nothing to refute that rule of law.”
K.B. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 941 P.2d 1288 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
K.B. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 941 P.2d 1288 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Ohio Casualty Insurance v. Henderson 939 P.2d 1337 Ariz. 1997
Ohio Casualty Insurance v. Henderson 939 P.2d 1337 Ariz. 1997
Ohio Casualty Insurance v. Henderson 927 P.2d 815 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
Northern Ins. Co. of New York v. Morgan 918 P.2d 1051 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Northern Ins. Co. of New York v. Morgan 918 P.2d 1051 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Republic Insurance v. Feidler 875 P.2d 187 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Republic Insurance v. Feidler 875 P.2d 187 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Co., , 529 * (insured struck person in the face).
St. Paul Property & Liability Insurance v. Eymann 802 P.2d 1043 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
St. Paul Property & Liability Insurance v. Eymann 802 P.2d 1043 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Co., , appellant Clark tapped Niemi on the shoulder and struck him in the face as he turned, injuring him.
Phoenix Control System, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North America 796 P.2d 463 Ariz. 1990
Phoenix Control System, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North America 796 P.2d 463 Ariz. 1990
Continental Insurance v. McDaniel 772 P.2d 6 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Continental Insurance v. McDaniel 772 P.2d 6 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Fire Insurance Exchange v. Berray 694 P.2d 191 Ariz. 1984
Fire Insurance Exchange v. Berray 694 P.2d 191 Ariz. 1984
With respect to the immediate intent which accompanies the intentional act
Transamerica Insurance Group v. Meere 694 P.2d 181 Ariz. 1984
Transamerica Insurance Group v. Meere 694 P.2d 181 Ariz. 1984
Fire Insurance Exchange v. Berray 694 P.2d 259 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Fire Insurance Exchange v. Berray 694 P.2d 259 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Globe American Casualty Co. v. Lyons 641 P.2d 251 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Globe American Casualty Co. v. Lyons 641 P.2d 251 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Vern Walton Motors v. Taylor 591 P.2d 555 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
Steinmetz v. National American Insurance 589 P.2d 911 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Vern Walton Motors v. Taylor 591 P.2d 555 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
Steinmetz v. National American Insurance 589 P.2d 911 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Two Arizona Court of Appeals decisions have touched on this issue, both from Division 2 of this court, , and Vanguard Insurance Co. v. Cantrell, 18 Ariz.App.
Iowa Kemper Insurance Co. v. Stone 269 N.W.2d 885 Minn. 1978
Lockhart v. Allstate Insurance 579 P.2d 1120 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
Lockhart v. Allstate Insurance 579 P.2d 1120 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
On the other hand, , we sustained a summary judgment in favor of the insurer, holding that the “intentional injury” exclusion clause was applicable because the act of striking another in the face “.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by