Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Borg v. Borg, 413 P.2d 784.

28 citing documents.

Peralta v. Murray Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Peralta v. Murray Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Taraska v. Taraska Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Taraska v. Taraska Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
To determine that there has been an abuse of discretion, “the record must be devoid of competent evidence to support the decision of the trial court.” ().
Rea v. Garza Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Rea v. Garza Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
See Alma S. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, (citing cases)
Kitchen v. Fleming, Sr. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Kitchen v. Fleming, Sr. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
To hold that an abuse of discretion has occurred, “the record must be devoid of competent evidence to support the decision of the [family] court.”
Durbin v. Keller Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Durbin v. Keller Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
The court abuses its discretion if the record is “devoid of competent evidence to support the decision.” (citation omitted).
Nicaise v. Sundaram 418 P.3d 1045 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Nicaise v. Sundaram 418 P.3d 1045 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Borg v. Borg , , 277, (citation omitted).
Heroyan-Hamayak v. Hamayak Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Heroyan-Hamayak v. Hamayak Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
P. 52(a), and ¶ 3 (App. 1998)), and we will affirm the custody order if there is any reasonable evidence to support it, ().
Thompson v. Thompson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Thompson v. Thompson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
An abuse of discretion occurs when “the record [is] devoid of competent evidence to support the decision of the trial court.” ().
Nicholas v. Nicholas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Nicholas v. Nicholas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
McNeil v. Goff Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
McNeil v. Goff Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
(“[T]he primary consideration in custody cases is the welfare and best interests of the children.”).
Stapley v. Stapley 485 P.2d 1181 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Stapley v. Stapley 485 P.2d 1181 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Earley v. Earley 458 P.2d 512 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Earley v. Earley 458 P.2d 512 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
*309 274, 276 , in these terms: “There can be no doubt that A.R.S.
Fenter v. Gruensfelder 422 P.2d 419 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
In Re Anonymous 422 P.2d 419 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
In Re Anonymous 422 P.2d 419 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Fenter v. Gruensfelder 422 P.2d 419 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
138 , , In re Adoption of Luke, 3 Ariz.App.