Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Price v. Sunmaster, 558 P.2d 966.

28 citing documents.

Summers Group, Inc. v. Tempe Mechanical, LLC 299 P.3d 743 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Summers Group, Inc. v. Tempe Mechanical, LLC 299 P.3d 743 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
¶ 15 The Legislature adopted the mechanics’ lien statutes “to protect laborers and materialmen enhancing the value of another’s property,” and “[generally, such statutes are to be liberally construed.”
Green v. Lisa Frank, Inc. 211 P.3d 16 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
Green v. Lisa Frank, Inc. 211 P.3d 16 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
Accordingly, “[i]f a complaint fails to state facts legally entitling plaintiff to a recovery, a default judgment rendered thereon is void.”
Master Financial, Inc. v. Woodburn 90 P.3d 1236 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Master Financial, Inc. v. Woodburn 90 P.3d 1236 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
See Mervyn’s, , , Ticey v. Randolph, 5 Ariz.App.
Brooks v. Consolidated Freightways Corp. 839 P.2d 1111 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Brooks v. Consolidated Freightways Corp. 839 P.2d 1111 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
R & M Oxford Construction, Inc. v. Smith 836 P.2d 454 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
R & M Oxford Construction, Inc. v. Smith 836 P.2d 454 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
See, , (material-men’s lien statute is remedial and is to be liberally construed).
Fortune v. Superior Court 768 P.2d 1194 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Fortune v. Superior Court 768 P.2d 1194 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Mervyn's, Inc. v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC. 697 P.2d 690 Ariz. 1985
Mervyn's, Inc. v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC. 697 P.2d 690 Ariz. 1985
5 , for its conclusion that “service by publication is insufficient to give [Kenneth Huston] notice and an opportunity to be heard.” Price , however, is distinguishable from the instant case.
Gilbreath v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance 685 P.2d 729 Ariz. 1984
Gilbreath v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance 685 P.2d 729 Ariz. 1984
see, however, , (permitting direct attack).
Collins v. Stockwell 671 P.2d 394 Ariz. 1983
Collins v. Stockwell 671 P.2d 394 Ariz. 1983
& L. Assn., , Kerr-McGee Oil Industries
Darnell v. Denton 669 P.2d 981 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Darnell v. Denton 669 P.2d 981 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Gila Valley Electric, Gas & Water Co. v. Arizona Trust & Savings Bank, , 215 P. 159 (1923); , Walls v. Stewart Bldg.
Energy Control Services, Inc. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 658 P.2d 820 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Energy Control Services, Inc. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 658 P.2d 820 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Webb v. Erickson 655 P.2d 15 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Webb v. Erickson 655 P.2d 15 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Cockerham v. Zikratch 619 P.2d 739 Ariz. 1980
Cockerham v. Zikratch 619 P.2d 739 Ariz. 1980
They rely on language to this effect in two recent cases by the Court of Appeals: , and Walls v. Stewart Building & Roofing Supply, Inc., 23 Ariz.App.
State v. Jordan 584 P.2d 561 Ariz. 1978
State v. Jordan 584 P.2d 561 Ariz. 1978
Walls v. Stewart Building & Roofing Supply, Inc., 23 Ariz.App.