Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Lewis v. Midway Lumber, Inc., 561 P.2d 750.

61 citing documents.

Koizumi v. Morogiello Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Koizumi v. Morogiello Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
But we emphasize that “[r]esolution of any conflict in the evidence is for the trier of fact,” Lewis v. Midway Lumber, Inc., and it is beyond our function to “reweigh the evidence or determine the credibility of witnesses.” Brown v. U.S. Fid.
Sun City v. Acc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sun City v. Acc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Co. of Minn., (concluding substantial evidence may support a factual finding “even though there might be substantial conflicting evidence”) (citing Lewis v. Midway Lumber, Inc., ).
Rodriguez v. Garcia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Rodriguez v. Garcia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Co. of Minn., (citing Lewis v. Midway Lumber, Inc., ).
Weitz Co. v. Heth 314 P.3d 569 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Weitz Co. v. Heth 314 P.3d 569 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
(“It is a universal rule that courts will not enlarge, stretch, expand, or extend a statute to matters not falling within its express provisions.”); Lewis v. Midway Lumber, Inc., , (“The courts cannot read into either the statutes or the claim of lien what is not there, or take from either what is there.”).
Allstate Utility Construction, LLC v. Towne Bank 263 P.3d 694 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Allstate Utility Construction, LLC v. Towne Bank 263 P.3d 694 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
See Lewis v. Midway Lumber, Inc., , (in interpreting lien statutes, “substantial compliance not inconsistent with the legislative purpose is sufficient”).
Delmastro & Eells v. Taco Bell Corp. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
Delmastro & Eells v. Taco Bell Corp. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
Co., 172 Ariz. at 229, 836 P.2d at 442
Fagerlie v. MARKHAM CONTRACTING CO., INC. 258 P.3d 185 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Fagerlie v. MARKHAM CONTRACTING CO., INC. 258 P.3d 185 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
A “reputed owner” is one having “for all appearances the title and possession of property.”
Jones v. Weston 212 P.3d 835 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
Jones v. Weston 212 P.3d 835 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
Lewis v. Midway Lumber, Inc.
Andrews v. Samaritan Health System 36 P.3d 57 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Andrews v. Samaritan Health System 36 P.3d 57 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
See Lewis v. Midway Lumber, Inc., , (addressing a mechanics lien).
Hunnicutt Construction, Inc. v. Stewart Title & Trust of Tucson Trust No. 3496 928 P.2d 725 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
Hunnicutt Construction, Inc. v. Stewart Title & Trust of Tucson Trust No. 3496 928 P.2d 725 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
(“[W]hen a statute creates a right and also provides a complete and valid remedy for the right created, the remedy thereby given is exclusive.”); Lewis v. Midway Lumber, Inc.
Tile USA v. Maricopa County 855 P.2d 430 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Tile USA v. Maricopa County 855 P.2d 430 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
In other statutory contexts, we have defined “improvement” to mean “a valuable addition or betterment to real estate,” including “[e]learing, grading and excavation of land.” Lewis v. Midway Lumber, Inc., , (interpreting former A.R.S.
Western Insulated Glass Co. v. McKay 852 P.2d 412 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Western Insulated Glass Co. v. McKay 852 P.2d 412 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
A reputed owner has been defined as “one who has for all appearances title and possession of property; one who, from all appearances or from supposition, is the owner of a thing.” Lewis v. Midway Lumber, Inc.
R & M Oxford Construction, Inc. v. Smith 836 P.2d 454 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
R & M Oxford Construction, Inc. v. Smith 836 P.2d 454 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
to protect the lien claimant against the untoward consequences of what probably was his own neglect.” Lewis v. Midway Lumber, Inc.
MLM Const. Co., Inc. v. Pace Corp. 836 P.2d 439 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
MLM Const. Co., Inc. v. Pace Corp. 836 P.2d 439 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Lewis v. Midway Lumber, Inc.
S.K. Drywall, Inc. v. Developers Financial Group, Inc. 819 P.2d 931 Ariz. 1991
S.K. Drywall, Inc. v. Developers Financial Group, Inc. 819 P.2d 931 Ariz. 1991
In Lewis v. Midway Lumber, Inc., the court of appeals defined improvement as a “catch-all” term that refers to the “subject of construction,” specifically, a “valuable addition or betterment to real estate such as a building, clearing, drain, fence, etc.”
Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. AHCCCS 803 P.2d 925 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. AHCCCS 803 P.2d 925 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Lewis v. Midway Lumber, Inc.
S.K. Drywall, Inc. v. Developers Financial Group, Inc. 799 P.2d 1362 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
S.K. Drywall, Inc. v. Developers Financial Group, Inc. 799 P.2d 1362 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
In Lewis v. Midway Lumber, Inc., , the court stated: This means that the steps required by A.R.S.
Egan-Ryan Mechanical Co. v. Cardon Meadows Development Corp. 818 P.2d 146 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Egan-Ryan Mechanical Co. v. Cardon Meadows Development Corp. 818 P.2d 146 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
217, 223 , Lewis v. Midway Lumber, Inc.
Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System 803 P.2d 925 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System 803 P.2d 925 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Lewis v. Midway Lumber, Inc.
Cashway Concrete & Materials v. Sanner Contracting Co. 761 P.2d 155 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Cashway Concrete & Materials v. Sanner Contracting Co. 761 P.2d 155 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Lewis v. Midway Lumber, Inc.
Commercial Cornice & Millwork, Inc. v. Camel Construction Services. Corp. 739 P.2d 1351 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Commercial Cornice & Millwork, Inc. v. Camel Construction Services. Corp. 739 P.2d 1351 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
§ 33-993(A)(l)); Lewis v. Midway Lumber, Inc., , (a notice and claim of lien which does not state the name of the record owner and which is not served on the record owner does not comply with A.R.S.
Scottsdale Memorial Health Systems, Inc. v. Clark 759 P.2d 602 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Scottsdale Memorial Health Systems, Inc. v. Clark 759 P.2d 602 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Lewis v. Midway Lumber, Inc.
Old Adobe Office Properties, Ltd. v. Gin 727 P.2d 26 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Old Adobe Office Properties, Ltd. v. Gin 727 P.2d 26 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
§ 33-993 “is to give the property owner an opportunity to protect himself and time to investigate the claim to determine whether it is a proper charge.” Lewis v. Midway Lumber, Inc.
Columbia Group, Inc. v. HOMEOWNERS ASS'N 727 P.2d 352 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Columbia Group, Inc. v. HOMEOWNERS ASS'N 727 P.2d 352 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Lewis v. Midway Lumber, Inc., , Advanced Living Center v. T.J.
Columbia Group, Inc. v. Jackson 725 P.2d 1120 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Columbia Group, Inc. v. Jackson 725 P.2d 1120 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Lewis v. Midway Lumber, Inc.