Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Velasco v. Mallory, 427 P.2d 540.

43 citing documents.

State v. Kerr Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Kerr Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
See ___ Ariz. ___, ___, ¶¶ 6, 8, -13 (App. 2024); -11 (1967) (“We will not render advisory opinions anticipative of troubles which do not exist; may never exist; and the precise form of which, should they ever arise, we cannot predict.”).
Flagstaff v. Desert Mountain Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Flagstaff v. Desert Mountain Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
- 11 (1967) (“We will not render advisory opinions anticipative of troubles which do not exist; may never exist; and the precise form of which, should they ever arise, we cannot predict.” (citations omitted)).
State v. Garcia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Garcia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
We will not render advisory opinions anticipative of troubles which do not exist; may never exist; and the precise form of which, should they ever arise, we cannot predict.” –11 (1967).
State v. Mixton 447 P.3d 829 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2019
State v. Gorla Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Gorla Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
arried away cannot logically be a ‘structure,’ for if that is true [then] anything capable of being locked and large enough to store anything at all is a structure for purposes of the burglary statutes.” While it is conceivable that applying the statutory definition of a nonresidential structure could lead to an absurd result at some point, –11 (1967) (“We will not render advisory opinions anticipative of troubles which do not exist; may never exist; and the precise form of which, should they ev
State v. Valle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Valle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
–11 (1967) (“We will not render advisory opinions anticipative of troubles which do not exist; may never exist; and the precise form of which, should they ever arise, we cannot predict.”).
First v. Sunnyslope Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
First v. Sunnyslope Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sheriff’s Office, n.6, ¶ 10, n.6 (App. 2007) (–11, –45 (1967)).
Southwest Barricades, L.L.C. v. Traffic Management, Inc. 377 P.3d 336 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Southwest Barricades, L.L.C. v. Traffic Management, Inc. 377 P.3d 336 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Young v. Rose 286 P.3d 518 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Young v. Rose 286 P.3d 518 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Appellate courts should not render “advisory opinions anticipative of troubles which do not exist; may never exist and the precise form of which, should they ever arise, we cannot predict.” Citibank v. Miller & Schroeder Fin., Inc., , (-11 , -45 (1967)).
Joseph M. Arpaio v. Jennifer Braillard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
Joseph M. Arpaio v. Jennifer Braillard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
Sheriff’s Office, n.6, n.6 (App. 2007), -11, -45 (1967).
State of Arizona v. Daughters-White Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
State of Arizona v. Daughters-White Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
-11, -45 (1967) (court should not render “advisory opinions anticipative of 6 troubles which do not exist; may never exist; and the precise form of which, should they ever arise, [the court] cannot predict”); see also Allen v. Graham, 8 Ariz. App.
State of Arizona v. Patrick James Soriano 176 P.3d 44 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
State of Arizona v. Patrick James Soriano 176 P.3d 44 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
See Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Water Res., n.7, n.7 (App. 2005) (appellate court “‘will not render advisory opinions anticipative of troubles which do not exist; may never exist; and the precise form of which, should they ever arise, we cannot predict’”), -11, -45 (1967).
West Valley View, Inc. v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office 165 P.3d 203 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
West Valley View, Inc. v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office 165 P.3d 203 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
The Sheriff’s Office argues, without authority, that the superior court’s decision "amounted to an advisory opinion.” An advisory opinion is "anticipative of troubles which do not exist; may never exist; and the precise form of which, should they ever arise, we cannot predict.” ; 410-11, -45 (1967).
Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Arizona Department of Water Resources 118 P.3d 1110 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Arizona Department of Water Resources 118 P.3d 1110 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
This is not the situation before us, and "[w]e will not render advisory opinions anticipative of troubles which do not exist; may never exist; and the precise form of which, should they ever arise, we cannot predict.” -11 , -45 (1967).
In Re Miguel R. 63 P.3d 1065 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
McMURREN v. JMC BUILDERS Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
McMURREN v. JMC BUILDERS Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
App. 406, 410-11, -45 (1967).
In Re Miguel R. 63 P.3d 1065 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Courts should “not render advisory opinions anticipative of troubles which do not exist; may never exist; and the precise form of which, should they ever arise, [the court] cannot predict.” -11 , -45 (App.1967).
Little v. Superior Court 884 P.2d 214 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Little v. Superior Court 884 P.2d 214 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
(hearsay evidence received without objection is sufficient to establish a fact and may be given the value of direct and competent evidence).
Citibank (Ariz.) v. Miller & Schroeder Fin., Inc. 812 P.2d 996 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Citibank (Ariz.) v. Miller & Schroeder Fin., Inc. 812 P.2d 996 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Courts should not render “advisory opinions anticipative of troubles which do not exist; may never exist; and the precise form of which, should they ever arise, we cannot predict.” -11 , -45 (App.1967).
Contempo-Tempe Mobile Home Owners Ass'n v. Steinert 696 P.2d 1376 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Contempo-Tempe Mobile Home Owners Ass'n v. Steinert 696 P.2d 1376 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Magraw v. Donovan, 177 F.Supp.
Mounce v. Coleman 650 P.2d 1233 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
Mounce v. Coleman 650 P.2d 1233 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
Wescott v. Glowenski 470 P.2d 713 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Wescott v. Glowenski 470 P.2d 713 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Rogers v. House 435 P.2d 492 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Rogers v. House 435 P.2d 492 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967