Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Amphitheater Public Schools v. Eastman, 574 P.2d 47.

25 citing documents.

Bennett James L. Bennett Money Purchase Pension Plan Meyerstein v. Baxter Group Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
Bennett James L. Bennett Money Purchase Pension Plan Meyerstein v. Baxter Group Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc. 6 P.3d 315 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc. 6 P.3d 315 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Barmat v. John and Jane Doe Partners AD 747 P.2d 1218 Ariz. 1987
Barmat v. John and Jane Doe Partners AD 747 P.2d 1218 Ariz. 1987
See, e.g., Wenk v. Horizon Moving & Storage Co., , , (both dealing with the attempt to recover attorney’s fees for breach of bailment contract implied in fact); , (declining to apply contract statute of limitations in malpractice action against accountant); Lewin v. Miller Wagner & Co.
Haldiman v. Gosnell Development Corp. 748 P.2d 1209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Ford v. Revlon, Inc. 734 P.2d 580 Ariz. 1987
Ford v. Revlon, Inc. 734 P.2d 580 Ariz. 1987
the court held that the test to be applied in determining whether the “arising out of contract” language of A.R.S.
Murdock-Bryant Construction, Inc. v. Pearson 703 P.2d 1206 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Murdock-Bryant Construction, Inc. v. Pearson 703 P.2d 1206 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
We find appellants’ , to be misplaced, and observe that in any event the Amphitheater decision has been significantly eroded.
Trebilcox v. Brown & Bain, P.A. 653 P.2d 45 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Trebilcox v. Brown & Bain, P.A. 653 P.2d 45 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
the court held that the test to be applied in determining whether the “arising out of contract” language of A.R.S.
Sparks v. Republic National Life Insurance 647 P.2d 1127 Ariz. 1982
Sparks v. Republic National Life Insurance 647 P.2d 1127 Ariz. 1982
Valencia v. White 654 P.2d 287 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
Valencia v. White 654 P.2d 287 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
Catalina Foothills Ass'n, Inc. v. White 646 P.2d 312 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
Catalina Foothills Ass'n, Inc. v. White 646 P.2d 312 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
We think the statute is broad enough — bearing in mind its stated purpose ‘to mitigate the burden of the expense of litigation to establish a just claim or a just defense’ — to afford relief for a defendant where the plaintiff is not entitled to recover on the contract on which his action is based.”
Nationwide Resources Corp. v. Ngai 630 P.2d 49 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Nationwide Resources Corp. v. Ngai 630 P.2d 49 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Earven v. Smith 621 P.2d 41 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
Earven v. Smith 621 P.2d 41 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Granillo 573 P.2d 80 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Granillo 573 P.2d 80 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by