Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Kohlbeck v. Handley, 415 P.2d 483.

28 citing documents.

Porter v. Spader 239 P.3d 743 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Porter v. Spader 239 P.3d 743 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Comm’n, , (untimely request for review in an administrative action); Wilshire Mortgage Corp. v. Elmer Shelton Concrete Contractor, Inc., , (untimely answer leading to a default judgment); Coconino Pulp & , (same); , (same); see also Andrew v. Indus.
Maldonado v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 897 P.2d 1362 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Maldonado v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 897 P.2d 1362 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
(setting aside a default because inexperienced secretary failed to enter deadline on calendar); Coconino Pulp & , (holding that a secretary’s failure to deliver calendar sheet was excusable neglect).
Ace Automotive Products, Inc. v. Van Duyne 750 P.2d 898 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Ace Automotive Products, Inc. v. Van Duyne 750 P.2d 898 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Sax v. Superior Court 711 P.2d 657 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Sax v. Superior Court 711 P.2d 657 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
21 A.L.R.3d 1248 (1966), the secretary with the duty to remind the lawyer of a due date forgot to remind him.
United Asphalt v. Industrial Commission 685 P.2d 1361 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
United Asphalt v. Industrial Commission 685 P.2d 1361 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Marvin, , , , In re Trull, 21 Ariz.App.
Cook v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 651 P.2d 365 Ariz. 1982
Cook v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 651 P.2d 365 Ariz. 1982
where a new secretary failed to advise the attorney of a deadline.
Gendron v. Skyline Bel Air Estates 590 P.2d 483 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
Gendron v. Skyline Bel Air Estates 590 P.2d 483 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
21 A.L.R.3d 1248 (1966).
Andrew v. Industrial Commission 576 P.2d 134 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Andrew v. Industrial Commission 576 P.2d 134 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Wilshire Mortgage Corp. v. Elmer Shelton Concrete Contractor, Inc.
Douglas v. Lease Investors, Inc. 504 P.2d 1310 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
Douglas v. Lease Investors, Inc. 504 P.2d 1310 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
Walker v. Kendig 489 P.2d 849 Ariz. 1971
Walker v. Kendig 489 P.2d 849 Ariz. 1971
383 , , Patapoff v. Vollstedt’s Inc., 267 F.2d 863 (9th Cir. 1959).
Haenichen v. Worthington 449 P.2d 319 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Haenichen v. Worthington 449 P.2d 319 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Goodman's Markets, Inc. v. Ward 421 P.2d 538 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Goodman's Markets, Inc. v. Ward 421 P.2d 538 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Prell v. Amado, 2 Ariz.App.
Hansen v. Brugliera 417 P.2d 548 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
Hansen v. Brugliera 417 P.2d 548 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
479 , , and our Supreme Court has recently stated: “Where no intervening rights have attached in reliance upon the judgment, any doubt should be resolved in favor of securing a trial upon the merits.” at 366 , , at 287 (1965).
C. Meisel Music Company v. Perl 415 P.2d 575 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
C. Meisel Music Company v. Perl 415 P.2d 575 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
Marquez v. Rapid Harvest Company, supra, , , filed 14 June, 1966.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by