Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Allen v. Fisher, 574 P.2d 1314.

72 citing documents.

Hall v. A.N.R. Freight System, Inc. 717 P.2d 434 Ariz. 1986
Hall v. A.N.R. Freight System, Inc. 717 P.2d 434 Ariz. 1986
12 , the Court of Appeals stated that “it is generally agreed that a substantive law creates, defines and regulates rights while a procedural one prescribes the method of enforcing such rights or obtaining redress.” Id.
State v. O'Haire 720 P.2d 119 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
State v. O'Haire 720 P.2d 119 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Moore v. City of Chandler 713 P.2d 325 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Moore v. City of Chandler 713 P.2d 325 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
The city answers by stating that since the change in the statute was procedural and did not affect substantive rights, it could be applied retroactively, relying on
Harrelson v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 697 P.2d 1119 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Harrelson v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 697 P.2d 1119 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Under the exception a statute does have retroactive effect if it is merely procedural and does not affect an earlier established substantive right.”
State v. Coconino Cty. Superior Ct., Div. II 678 P.2d 1386 Ariz. 1984
State v. Coconino Cty. Superior Ct., Div. II 678 P.2d 1386 Ariz. 1984
Gulf Homes, Inc. v. Gonzales 676 P.2d 635 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Gulf Homes, Inc. v. Gonzales 676 P.2d 635 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Abrams v. Horizon Corp. 669 P.2d 51 Ariz. 1983
Abrams v. Horizon Corp. 669 P.2d 51 Ariz. 1983
“Under the exception a statute does have retroactive effect if it is merely procedural and does not affect an earlier established substantive right.”
Gulf Homes, Inc. v. Gonzales 676 P.2d 635 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Gulf Homes, Inc. v. Gonzales 676 P.2d 635 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Bouldin v. Turek 607 P.2d 954 Ariz. 1979
Bouldin v. Turek 607 P.2d 954 Ariz. 1979
Gaston v. Hunter 588 P.2d 326 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Gaston v. Hunter 588 P.2d 326 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
This provision, which is a part of recent, comprehensive legislation on medical malpractice (1976 Ariz.Sess.Laws, 1st Spec.Sess., ch. 1 at 989), would not affect actions initiated before the statute’s effective date
Hall v. Olague 579 P.2d 577 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
Hall v. Olague 579 P.2d 577 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978