Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Farmers Insurance Group v. Worth Insurance Co., 443 P.2d 431.

34 citing documents.

Boser v. Ware Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Boser v. Ware Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Russell Piccoli v. O'Donnell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Russell Piccoli v. O'Donnell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Kondaur Capital Corp. v. Pinal County 330 P.3d 379 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Kondaur Capital Corp. v. Pinal County 330 P.3d 379 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Co., (“It is a prerequisite to our appellate jurisdiction that the appellant be a ‘party aggrieved’ by the judgment or order.”).
Douglas v. Governing Board of Window Rock Consolidated School District No. 8 210 P.3d 1275 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Douglas v. Governing Board of Window Rock Consolidated School District No. 8 210 P.3d 1275 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Co., (“It is a prerequisite to our appellate jurisdiction that the appellant be a ‘party aggrieved’ by the judgment or order from which the appeal is taken.”).
Dowling v. Stapley 211 P.3d 1235 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Dowling v. Stapley 211 P.3d 1235 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Co., , (party to a declaratory judgment action cannot appeal from the judgment unless it is an aggrieved party, i.e., the "judgment must operate, by its own force, on the property rights of such person, or bear directly upon one or more of his personal interest ...’’).
Penny Osuna v. Walmart Stores, Inc. Sam's Club Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Penny Osuna v. Walmart Stores, Inc. Sam's Club Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Co., (“It is a prerequisite to our appellate jurisdiction that the appellant be a ‘party aggrieved’ by the judgment or order from which the appeal is taken.”).
Golembieski v. O'Rielly R v. Center, Inc. 708 P.2d 1325 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Golembieski v. O'Rielly R v. Center, Inc. 708 P.2d 1325 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Matter of Estate of Balcomb 562 P.2d 399 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Matter of Estate of Balcomb 562 P.2d 399 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Rule 73(a), Rules of Civil Procedure, 16 A.R.S.
Chambers v. United Farm Workers Organizing Committee 541 P.2d 567 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Chambers v. United Farm Workers Organizing Committee 541 P.2d 567 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Compass Realty & Investment Corp. v. a a Refrigeration & Heating, Inc. 517 P.2d 1107 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Compass Realty & Investment Corp. v. a a Refrigeration & Heating, Inc. 517 P.2d 1107 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Planned Parenthood Center of Tucson, Inc. v. Marks 497 P.2d 534 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
Planned Parenthood Center of Tucson, Inc. v. Marks 497 P.2d 534 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
55 , , Iman v. Southern Pacific Co., 7 Ariz.App.
Harris v. Hoelzen 491 P.2d 24 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Harris v. Hoelzen 491 P.2d 24 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
A “party aggrieved” , : “In order to have an appealable interest in a judgment, the judgment must operate, by its own force, on the property rights of such person, or bear directly upon one or more of his personal interests; there must be a substantial grievance — a denial of some personal or property right or the impo
In Re Estate of Griswold 475 P.2d 508 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
In Re Estate of Griswold 475 P.2d 508 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Turner v. WORTH INSURANCE COMPANY 464 P.2d 990 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
Turner v. WORTH INSURANCE COMPANY 464 P.2d 990 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
Valley National Bank v. Tamms 466 P.2d 774 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
Valley National Bank v. Tamms 466 P.2d 774 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
Dismissal is required for lack of an “aggrieved party,” Christian v. Cotten, supra; , or lack of an appealable order.
Gage v. Gage 462 P.2d 93 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Gage v. Gage 462 P.2d 93 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Although appellate courts will consider extrinsic evidence when a challenge to appellate jurisdiction is presented, , , 5 Am.
Cofield v. Sanders 451 P.2d 320 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Cofield v. Sanders 451 P.2d 320 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
114 , or as to “appealable interest.” Farmers Insurance Group v. *242 Worth Insurance Co., , Christian v. Cotten, 1 Ariz.App.