Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Sun Lodge, Inc. v. Ramada Development Co., 606 P.2d 30.

28 citing documents.

Enyart v. Transamerica Insurance 985 P.2d 556 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Enyart v. Transamerica Insurance 985 P.2d 556 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Rourk v. State 821 P.2d 273 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Rourk v. State 821 P.2d 273 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
They cite Sun Lodge, , for the proposition that the issues on appeal are limited to the issues raised in a motion for new trial.
Morn v. City of Phoenix 730 P.2d 873 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Morn v. City of Phoenix 730 P.2d 873 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Gaertner v. Sommer 714 P.2d 1316 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Gaertner v. Sommer 714 P.2d 1316 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Mister Donut of America, Inc. v. Harris 723 P.2d 696 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Mister Donut of America, Inc. v. Harris 723 P.2d 696 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Nevertheless, Mister Donut argues that two Arizona cases mandate an election: Edward Greenband Enterprises of Arizona v. Pepper, supra, and Sun Lodge
Maake v. L & J PRESS CORP. 710 P.2d 472 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Maake v. L & J PRESS CORP. 710 P.2d 472 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
We agree, Sun Lodge, , but we are also persuaded that seeking a discovery sanction does not subject a party to jurisdiction.
Rustin v. Cook 694 P.2d 316 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
Rustin v. Cook 694 P.2d 316 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
Sun Lodge, , , modified on reh’g
Pruitt v. Pavelin 685 P.2d 1347 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Pruitt v. Pavelin 685 P.2d 1347 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Arnold v. Cesare 668 P.2d 891 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Arnold v. Cesare 668 P.2d 891 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Phillips v. Adler 657 P.2d 893 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
Phillips v. Adler 657 P.2d 893 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
Spudnuts, Inc. v. Lane 641 P.2d 912 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
Spudnuts, Inc. v. Lane 641 P.2d 912 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
Apolito v. Johnson, 3 Ariz.App.
Matcha v. Winn 638 P.2d 1361 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Matcha v. Winn 638 P.2d 1361 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Sun Lodge, , Van Dusen v. Registrar oí Contractors, 12 Ariz.App.
Pinnacle Peak Developers v. TRW Investment Corp. 631 P.2d 540 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Pinnacle Peak Developers v. TRW Investment Corp. 631 P.2d 540 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Appellees argue that evidence of the alleged oral representation made prior to execution of the option agreement would be barred by the parol evidence rule, citing Standage Ventures, , Sun Lodge, , 7-G Ranching Co. v. Stites, 4 Ariz.App.
Kalil Bottling Co. v. Burroughs Corp. 619 P.2d 1055 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
Kalil Bottling Co. v. Burroughs Corp. 619 P.2d 1055 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
44-2309; Sun Lodge, , Apolito v. Johnson, 3 Ariz.App.