Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Parks v. MacRo-dynamics, Inc., 591 P.2d 1005.

60 citing documents.

Soto v. Ten Bridges Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Soto v. Ten Bridges Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
¶18 The nine elements of common law fraud under Arizona law are “a material, false representation, scienter, the fraudfeasor’s intent to induce reliance upon the misrepresentation, the fraud victim’s ignorance of its falsity, his actual, reasonable reliance, and his consequent and proximate injury.” Parks v. Macro-Dynamics, Inc.
Sanders v. Harris Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Sanders v. Harris Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
§ 44-1521(7), -1522(A); Parks v. Macro-Dynamics, Inc., -21 (App. 1979) (discussing elements for a private cause of action under the CFA).
Whiles v. Henderson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Whiles v. Henderson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Cf. Spudnuts, (“[T]he courts should be liberal in allowing amendments to the pleading when [Rule 9(b)] is violated.”); Parks v. Macro-Dynamics, Inc., (“It is an abuse of discretion to deny a motion for leave to amend without reason.
Simmons v. ferrantelli/west Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Simmons v. ferrantelli/west Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
P. 12(b); see also Parks v. Macro-Dynamics, Inc., –20, –08 (App. 1979) (“If matters outside the complaint are presented to and not excluded by the court, the motion is one for summary judgment, provided all parties are given a reasonable opportunity to present their factual claims to the court.”).
Watts v. Medicis Pharmaceutical Corp. 342 P.3d 847 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Watts v. Medicis Pharmaceutical Corp. 342 P.3d 847 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Cook v. Orkin Exterminating Co., Inc. 258 P.3d 149 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Cook v. Orkin Exterminating Co., Inc. 258 P.3d 149 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
In Parks v. Macro-Dynamics, Inc., , the court held, in evaluating a motion to dismiss, that the plaintiffs complaint had alleged the elements of a private action for consumer fraud and was therefore legally sufficient.
In Re Search Warrant No. 08 Sw 1417 233 P.3d 618 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
In Re Search Warrant No. 08 Sw 1417 233 P.3d 618 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
See Parks v. Macro-Dynamics, Inc., -20 , -08 (App.1979) (motion to dismiss referring to facts not in complaint viewed as motion for summary judgment); see also Ariz. R. Civ.
Logan v. Forever Living Products International, Inc. 52 P.3d 760 Ariz. 2002
Logan v. Forever Living Products International, Inc. 52 P.3d 760 Ariz. 2002
Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/Gilleland) , , 1294 (1984); Parks v. Macro-Dynamics, Inc., , (“A Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, which assumes the complaint’s allegations are true, attacks the legal sufficiency of the complaint”) (citation omitted).
REPUBLIC NAT. BANK OF NY v. Pima County 25 P.3d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
REPUBLIC NAT. BANK OF NY v. Pima County 25 P.3d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
Parks v. Macro-Dynamics, Inc., , (“A Rule 12(b) motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, which assumes the complaint’s allegations are true, attacks the legal sufficiency of the complaint.”).
Moretto v. Samaritan Health System 947 P.2d 917 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Moretto v. Samaritan Health System 947 P.2d 917 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
See, e.g., Parks v. Macro-Dynamics, Inc., -20 , -08 (App.1979); accord 5A Charles Alan Wright and Arthur R. Miller, Federal Practice And Procedure § 1356, at 294 (2d ed.1990).
Barry & Sewall Industrial Supply Co. v. Estate of Barry 910 P.2d 657 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Barry & Sewall Industrial Supply Co. v. Estate of Barry 910 P.2d 657 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Parks v. Macro-Dynamics, Inc., -20 , -08 (App. 1979).
Fisher v. Maricopa County Stadium District 912 P.2d 1345 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Fisher v. Maricopa County Stadium District 912 P.2d 1345 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Parks v. Macro-Dynamics, Inc., -20 , -08 (App.1979).
Waste Manufacturing & Leasing Corp. v. Hambicki 900 P.2d 1220 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Waste Manufacturing & Leasing Corp. v. Hambicki 900 P.2d 1220 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
237 (D.Ariz.1992) (fraud related to partnership agreement for real estate investment; , (misrepresentations related to agreement for assignment of rights to commercial liquor license); Parks v. Macro-Dynamics, Inc., , (fraud arising out of agreement to provide venture capital).
Nahom v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Arizona, Inc. 885 P.2d 1113 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Nahom v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Arizona, Inc. 885 P.2d 1113 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
The elements of a private cause of action for consumer fraud are “a false promise or misrepresentation made in connection with the sale or advertisement of merchandise and the hearer’s consequent and proximate injury.” Parks v. Macro-Dynamics, Inc.
Maurer v. Cerkvenik-Anderson Travel, Inc. 890 P.2d 69 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1994
Maurer v. Cerkvenik-Anderson Travel, Inc. 890 P.2d 69 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1994
See, Parks v. Macro-Dynamcis, Inc.
Colonial Tri-City Ltd. Partnership v. Ben Franklin Stores, Inc. 880 P.2d 648 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Colonial Tri-City Ltd. Partnership v. Ben Franklin Stores, Inc. 880 P.2d 648 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Parks v. Micro-Dynamics, Inc., -20 , -08 (App.1979).
Ness v. Western Security Life Insurance 851 P.2d 122 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Ness v. Western Security Life Insurance 851 P.2d 122 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
See Parks v. Macro-Dynamics, Inc.
Daggett v. County of Maricopa 770 P.2d 384 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Daggett v. County of Maricopa 770 P.2d 384 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
See Parks v. Macro-Dynamics, Inc.
Dewey v. Arnold 764 P.2d 1124 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Dewey v. Arnold 764 P.2d 1124 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Parks v. Macro-Dynamics, Inc.
Godbehere v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. 746 P.2d 1319 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Godbehere v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. 746 P.2d 1319 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Parks v. Macro-Dynamics, Inc.
FLOOD CONTROL DIST. OF MARICOPA CTY. v. Conlin 712 P.2d 979 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
FLOOD CONTROL DIST. OF MARICOPA CTY. v. Conlin 712 P.2d 979 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Parks v. Macro-Dynamics, Inc.
Donnelly Construction Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/Gilleland 677 P.2d 1292 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Donnelly Const. Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/Gilleland 677 P.2d 1292 Ariz. 1984
Donnelly Construction Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/Gilleland 677 P.2d 1292 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Parks v. Macro-Dynamics, Inc.
Donnelly Const. Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/Gilleland 677 P.2d 1292 Ariz. 1984
Parks v. Macro-Dynamics, Inc.
Schmidt v. American Leasco 679 P.2d 532 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Schmidt v. American Leasco 679 P.2d 532 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
See Parks v. Macro-Dynamics, Inc.
Matter of Estate of Coffin 671 P.2d 921 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Matter of Estate of Coffin 671 P.2d 921 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Parks v. Macro-Dynamics, Inc.