Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Ferguson v. Arizona Department of Economic Security, 594 P.2d 544.

28 citing documents.

Brady v. ades/esa Tax Unit Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Brady v. ades/esa Tax Unit Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Simmons v. Ades Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Simmons v. Ades Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Sec., (To be entitled to unemployment benefits, an employee must show good cause for voluntarily leaving.).
Barriga v. Ades Precision Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Barriga v. Ades Precision Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Sec., (to be entitled to unemployment benefits, an employee must show good cause for voluntarily leaving).
Klp v. Ador Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Klp v. Ador Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Sec., (concluding that a regulation “should not be inconsistent with or contrary to the provisions of a statute .
In Re Pima County Mental Health No. MH-2010-0047 263 P.3d 643 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
In Re Pima County Mental Health No. MH-2010-0047 263 P.3d 643 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
Sharpe v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System 207 P.3d 741 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Sharpe v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System 207 P.3d 741 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Parker v. Arizona Interscholastic Ass'n 59 P.3d 806 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Parker v. Arizona Interscholastic Ass'n 59 P.3d 806 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Sec., , (“[A] rale or regulation of an administrative agency should not be inconsistent with or contrary to the provisions of a statute 3 .
Hilde v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 803 P.2d 909 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Hilde v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 803 P.2d 909 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Fiskewold v. HM Smyth Co., Inc. 440 N.W.2d 164 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 750 P.2d 913 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 750 P.2d 913 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
At & T Information Systems, Inc. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 741 P.2d 703 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
At & T Information Systems, Inc. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 741 P.2d 703 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Pima Community College v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 714 P.2d 472 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Pima Community College v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 714 P.2d 472 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Ferguson v. Arizona Dep’t of Economic Security, , see generally, Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 7:10-15 at 36-75 (1979).
Senor T's Restaurant v. Industrial Commission 641 P.2d 848 Ariz. 1982
Senor T's Restaurant v. Industrial Commission 641 P.2d 848 Ariz. 1982
Roman v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 637 P.2d 1084 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Roman v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 637 P.2d 1084 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
McMullen v. Hargis 624 P.2d 339 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by